2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LIGKA: A linear gyrokinetic code for the description of background kinetic and fast particle effects on the MHD stability in tokamaks

Abstract: In a plasma with a population of super-thermal particles generated by heating or fusion processes, kinetic effects can lead to the additional destabilisation of MHD modes or even to additional energetic particle modes. In order to describe these modes, a new linear gyrokinetic MHD code has been developed and tested, LIGKA (linear gyrokinetic shear Alfvén physics) [Ph. Lauber, Linear gyrokinetic description of fast particle effects on the MHD stability in tokamaks, Ph.D. Thesis, TU Mü nchen, 2003; Ph. Lauber, S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
125
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In its general behaviour STAE-K is closest to NOVA-K. Note that for this comparison an older version of NOVA-K [25,27], which does not include FOW-and FLR effects, was used, which makes the underlying physical model very similar to that of STAE-K. Just like STAE-K, LIGKA [28] is a non-perturbative eigenvalue code but with a much more complex model, and it is not surprising that these two codes show differences. It can also be noted that for fast-ion velocities less than approximately v A,0 /2, the mode is still damped.…”
Section: B Benchmark With Kin-2dem and Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In its general behaviour STAE-K is closest to NOVA-K. Note that for this comparison an older version of NOVA-K [25,27], which does not include FOW-and FLR effects, was used, which makes the underlying physical model very similar to that of STAE-K. Just like STAE-K, LIGKA [28] is a non-perturbative eigenvalue code but with a much more complex model, and it is not surprising that these two codes show differences. It can also be noted that for fast-ion velocities less than approximately v A,0 /2, the mode is still damped.…”
Section: B Benchmark With Kin-2dem and Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fully kinetic codes predict a much stronger frequency change for high temperatures. Curves other than STAE-K taken from [26,28]. Comparison of STAE-K to analytic theory in the limit of very small inverse aspect ratio for various fast-particle temperatures.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerically, the TAE modes have also been studied by many authors. For example, they have been simulated using the reduced kinetic approach [13], the first-principle global gyrokinetic eigenvalue approach [14,15], the electron-fluid ion-kinetic hybrid gyrokinetic model [16,17], and using the global gyrokinetic particle-in-cell (PIC) code [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19,20] (global eigenvalue code LIGKA) to study the continuum and radiative damping mechanisms. The electron-fluid ion-kinetic hybrid gyrokinetic model has been benchmarked vs. the theoretical predictions for the TAE mode in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%