2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2015.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lightweight private proximity testing for geospatial social networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in PPT the parties should have smart devices with LBS. Thus, to compare the complexity of our proposed protocols and the previous decentralized protocols for PPT [11,[18][19][20][21][22], we demonstrate their complexities in Table 2.…”
Section: Complexity Comparison Of Ptit_gröbner Protocol and Garbled Circuit_based Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in PPT the parties should have smart devices with LBS. Thus, to compare the complexity of our proposed protocols and the previous decentralized protocols for PPT [11,[18][19][20][21][22], we demonstrate their complexities in Table 2.…”
Section: Complexity Comparison Of Ptit_gröbner Protocol and Garbled Circuit_based Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the problem of Private Proximity Testing (PPT) is a similar issue, which is only applicable in smart devices. It has attracted the attention of some researchers since 2006 [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. In PPT, the proximity of two Location Based Services (LBS) are securely examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%