2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-53018-4_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lightweight Multiplication in $$GF(2^n)$$ with Applications to MDS Matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not discuss efficiency issues but the theory accumulated and discussed here should provide an idea towards efficiency. The readers may look at [6] and the references mentioned therein for efficient implementation of MDS matrices. We revisit the results discussed in [2] and find a gap in one of the lemmas in that paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not discuss efficiency issues but the theory accumulated and discussed here should provide an idea towards efficiency. The readers may look at [6] and the references mentioned therein for efficient implementation of MDS matrices. We revisit the results discussed in [2] and find a gap in one of the lemmas in that paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, x ⊕ x = 0 and obviously wt(x , x) ≥ wt(x ⊕ x ). Thus, considering equation 3, we have (5) wt…”
Section: Cryptographic Properties Of L Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations (4) and (5) implies that b g ≥ b f . In the case of b f = w f + 1, as w f = w g , we have b g = b f , by Lemma 3.3.…”
Section: Cryptographic Properties Of L Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With lightweight cryptography in mind, there has been a substantial amount of publications in the last few years on constructions for lightweight MDS mappings, see e.g., [BKL16;GPP11;LS16;LW16]. This has led to a better understanding of the implementation cost of such mappings in relation to their dimensions: the number and size of elements (e.g., 4 bytes in MixColumns).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%