Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3): UTF-8 String Representation of Distinguished Names

Wahl, Mark; Kille, S.; Howes, T.

doi:10.17487/rfc2253

Cited by 25 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In X.509, a certificate includes a distinguished name [29,43], which is chosen to adequately identify a legal person, and is verified as accurate by the certification authority. In PGP, a certificate contains unspecified identifying information, "such as his or her name, user ID, photograph, and so on" [44]; this is usually an e-mail address.…”

Section: Persons In the Domain Of Discoursementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The binary octets can be represented in a graph using xsd:base64Binary. The interpretation of these sequences as X.509 is specified in [30], which gives a distinguished name from RFC 2253 [43], which identifies a person. If c gives a PGP certificate then given the potential vagueness of the identifying information we allow all pairs of in which the person matches the identifying information.…”

Section: Persons In the Domain Of Discoursementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Named graphs, provenance and trust

Carroll

Bizer

Hayes

et al. 2005

Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '05

313

249

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Semantic Web consists of many RDF graphs nameable by URIs. This paper extends the syntax and semantics of RDF to cover such Named Graphs. This enables RDF statements that describe graphs, which is beneficial in many Semantic Web application areas. As a case study, we explore the application area of Semantic Web publishing: Named Graphs allow publishers to communicate assertional intent, and to sign their graphs; information consumers can evaluate specific graphs using task-specific trust policies, and act on information from those Named Graphs that they accept. Graphs are trusted depending on: their content; information about the graph; and the task the user is performing. The extension of RDF to Named Graphs provides a formally defined framework to be a foundation for the Semantic Web trust layer.

show abstract

Section: Persons In the Domain Of Discoursementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Persons In the Domain Of Discoursementioning

confidence: 99%

Named graphs, provenance and trust

Carroll

Bizer

Hayes

et al. 2005

Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '05

313

249

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The entryName field is the UTF-8 string representation of the name of the dynamic entry [3]. This entry must already exist.…”

Section: Refresh Requestmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3): Extensions for Dynamic Directory Services

Yaacovi¹,

Wahl²,

Genovese³

1999

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…These references are in the form of "Directory Distinguished Name" [21] of the corresponding object. It is intended that Directory management applications will use these references to obtain further information on the objects of interest.…”

Section: Mib Designmentioning

confidence: 99%