2016
DOI: 10.1002/wrna.1358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lights, camera, action! Capturing the spliceosome and pre‐mRNA splicing with single‐molecule fluorescence microscopy

Abstract: The process of removing intronic sequences from a precursor to messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) to yield a mature mRNA transcript via splicing is an integral step in eukaryotic gene expression. Splicing is carried out by a cellular nanomachine called the spliceosome that is composed of RNA components and dozens of proteins. Despite decades of study, many fundamentals of spliceosome function have remained elusive. Recent developments in single molecule fluorescence microscopy have afforded new tools to better probe the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
(294 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The supraspliceosome model is consistent with most imaging studies, and different interpretations can account for the limited discrepancies. For example, the differences in K o ff between the U snRNPs were interpreted as supporting the step‐wise assembly model . However, an alternative interpretation of these results is that the binding constants of U1 and U4 snRNPs to the spliceosome are different from those of U2 and U5 snRNPs, and not necessarily reflecting their loss from the spliceosome.…”
Section: The Supraspliceosomementioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The supraspliceosome model is consistent with most imaging studies, and different interpretations can account for the limited discrepancies. For example, the differences in K o ff between the U snRNPs were interpreted as supporting the step‐wise assembly model . However, an alternative interpretation of these results is that the binding constants of U1 and U4 snRNPs to the spliceosome are different from those of U2 and U5 snRNPs, and not necessarily reflecting their loss from the spliceosome.…”
Section: The Supraspliceosomementioning
confidence: 92%
“…For example, the differences in Ko ff between the U snRNPs were interpreted as supporting the step-wise assembly model. 38 However, an alternative interpretation of these results is that the binding constants of U1 and U4 snRNPs to the spliceosome are different from those of U2 and U5 snRNPs, and not necessarily reflecting their loss from the spliceosome. Indeed, U1 is less tightly bound to the spliceosome, and is released from complex B upon treatment with heparin.…”
Section: The Supraspliceosome Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The active spliceosome assembles through a series of discrete, ATP-dependent conformational transitions that are separable by native gel electrophoresis [108] and also have been illuminated by single molecule fluorescence (reviewed in [109]). The “E”-complex of the U1 snRNP and U2AF–SF1 complex at the 5′ and 3′ splice sites is followed by the ATP-dependent “A”-complex, in which the SF3B-containing U2 snRNP stably associates.…”
Section: Recurrent Somatic Mutations Of Pre-mrna Splicing Factors In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite decades of study, many fundamentals of the spliceosome function have remained elusive. Single-molecule detection methods enabled investigators to monitor the dynamics of specific splicing components, whole spliceosomes, and even cotranscriptional splicing within living cells (DeHaven et al, 2016).…”
Section: Applications Of Single-molecule Techniques In Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%