1998
DOI: 10.1109/15.736222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lightning-induced overvoltages in power lines: validity of various approximations made in overvoltage calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The line parameters include the longitudinal ground impedance and the transverse ground admittance, which are both frequency-dependent. The latter can generally be neglected for typical overhead lines, due to its small contribution to the overall transverse admittance of the line [6]. Rachidi et al [7] showed that for lines whose length does not exceed a certain "critical" value (typically 2 km) and for the strike point equidistant from the line terminations, the surge propagation along the line is not appreciably affected by the ground finite conductivity, and therefore, the ground impedance can also be neglected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The line parameters include the longitudinal ground impedance and the transverse ground admittance, which are both frequency-dependent. The latter can generally be neglected for typical overhead lines, due to its small contribution to the overall transverse admittance of the line [6]. Rachidi et al [7] showed that for lines whose length does not exceed a certain "critical" value (typically 2 km) and for the strike point equidistant from the line terminations, the surge propagation along the line is not appreciably affected by the ground finite conductivity, and therefore, the ground impedance can also be neglected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper reports on the exact numerical evaluation of the electromagnetic fields over a lossy ground for a realistic lightning current source (transmission line model) by improving the computational methods and we present the numerical results as a function of different parameters. Then we compare our numerical computational results with previous approximations (Zenneck, and Cooray-Rubinstein (Cooray, 1992;Rubinstein, 1996;Cooray and Scuka, 1998) approximations) and we discuss their validity limit. Finally we recommend you to use the present numerical computaions for this problem because we have reduced computer time by means of newly developed computation algorithms described in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then Cooray (1992) and Cooray and Scuka (1998) and Rubinstein (1996) (The Cooray-Rubinstein expression has been discussed by Wait (1997).) have proposed their approximations for short and intermediate distances (200m ≤ r ≤ 1.5km), and so this Cooray and Rubinstein approximation is compared with our computations in order to find out the usefulness of our computational method where the observing point P is located at (r, ϕ, h) as in Fig.1, and the quantities with the superscript ∞ are those for the perfectly conducting ground.…”
Section: Formulation and Numerical Computations Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When frequency domain method is involved, the lightning channel above the ground is always regarded as a vertical electric dipole. The Sommerfeld convolution integral is introduced, but it is difficult to carry out the integral numerically [11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%