2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017gl072796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lightning attachment process to common buildings

Abstract: The physical mechanism of lightning attachment to grounded structures is one of the most important issues in lightning physics research, and it is the basis for the design of the lightning protection systems. Most of what is known about the attachment process comes from leader propagation models that are mostly based on laboratory observations of long electrical discharges or from observations of lightning attachment to tall structures. In this paper we use high‐speed videos to analyze the attachment process o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
44
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(41 reference statements)
9
44
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The most accurate approach to estimate the SD is considered the reverse propagation procedure adopted in this work (four events). The differences between the propagation speeds of the positive and negative leaders calculated in this work and in Saba et al () suggest that assuming a same speed for both leaders, as done by Tran and Rakov () and Wang et al (, ) leads to underestimation of the SD. On the other hand, adopting a general composite propagation speed in the last 300 m propagated distance, as used in this work for estimating the SD of 17 first return strokes from records of current, is expected to yield moderate errors, as demonstrated by the SD calculated for events A, B, and C, which exhibit a maximum error of 18%.…”
Section: Applying This New Approach For Estimating the Sd Of Negativecontrasting
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most accurate approach to estimate the SD is considered the reverse propagation procedure adopted in this work (four events). The differences between the propagation speeds of the positive and negative leaders calculated in this work and in Saba et al () suggest that assuming a same speed for both leaders, as done by Tran and Rakov () and Wang et al (, ) leads to underestimation of the SD. On the other hand, adopting a general composite propagation speed in the last 300 m propagated distance, as used in this work for estimating the SD of 17 first return strokes from records of current, is expected to yield moderate errors, as demonstrated by the SD calculated for events A, B, and C, which exhibit a maximum error of 18%.…”
Section: Applying This New Approach For Estimating the Sd Of Negativecontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…Based on high‐speed videos, Tran and Rakov () estimated SD of 14 first return strokes and new ground terminations. In high‐speed videos, Saba et al () detected the initiation of the upward leader from a 50 m high building and estimated the striking distance of three subsequent RSs. Using LAPOS, Wang et al () reported the initiation height of four RSs, including two first RSs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mazur et al () assumed the ratio to be equal to 2. Dellera and Garbagnati (, ) assumed this ratio to change from 4 to 1 during the attachment process, and Saba et al () showed that the ratio was from 2.3 to 4.8. In this study, we found that the average speed of SDL‐1 was 0.9 that of UCL (very close to their connection).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The speed of upward positive leader at its initiation is studied by high-speed video camera in recent years (e.g., Biagi et al, 2011;Jiang et al, 2014;Saba et al, 2017). Saba et al (2017) using high-speed video cameras observed three attachment processes occurred on two buildings under 60 m. Three UCLs from lightning rods move at a constant speed, ranging between 4.3 and 6.2 × 10 4 m/s. Visacro et al (2017) discussed different approaches to estimating the SD from high-speed video and current records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation