2020 IEEE 6th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/wf-iot48130.2020.9221150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-Weight RetinaNet for Object Detection on Edge Devices

Abstract: Object detection has gained great progress driven by the development of deep learning. Compared with a widely studied task -classification, generally speaking, object detection even need one or two orders of magnitude more FLOPs (floating point operations) in processing the inference task. To enable a practical application, it is essential to explore effective runtime and accuracy trade-off scheme. Recently, a growing number of studies are intended for object detection on resource constraint devices, such as Y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we know, the one-stage, CNN-based object-detection method, Reti-naNet [27] with a novel loss function, can not only detect objects but also reduce the impact of class imbalance on object classification. From the view of object-detection performance, RetinaNet outperforms SSD, YOLOv2, and YOLOv3 for the COCO dataset [28]. From the view of computation complexity, an object-detection network usually has higher computational complexity compared with an image classification network [28].…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As we know, the one-stage, CNN-based object-detection method, Reti-naNet [27] with a novel loss function, can not only detect objects but also reduce the impact of class imbalance on object classification. From the view of object-detection performance, RetinaNet outperforms SSD, YOLOv2, and YOLOv3 for the COCO dataset [28]. From the view of computation complexity, an object-detection network usually has higher computational complexity compared with an image classification network [28].…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the view of object-detection performance, RetinaNet outperforms SSD, YOLOv2, and YOLOv3 for the COCO dataset [28]. From the view of computation complexity, an object-detection network usually has higher computational complexity compared with an image classification network [28]. For one-stage object-detection networks, RetinaNet is superior to YOLOv3 in terms of FLOPs (floatingpoint operation) and mAP (mean average precision) for object detection [28].…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations