1981
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(81)90066-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light scattering from particles of regular and irregular shape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this limitation, the pragmatic approach has been to vary the shape distribution of these spheroids to best match the observed and computed scattering intensities. The success of this approach can be measured by the fact that predictions of nearly flat phase functions at side scattering angles by size distributions of volume‐equivalent spheroids are borne out in laboratory measurements of natural particles [ Jaggard et al , 1981; Volten et al , 2001], and in the significant improvements between measured and modeled sky radiance when spheroids are used instead of spheres in the case of mineral dust [ Dubovik et al , 2002b]. With these considerations, the agreement between the lidar ratios for mineral dust we predicted using spheroids (i.e., scattering at 180 degrees) and those measured in the field is very encouraging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this limitation, the pragmatic approach has been to vary the shape distribution of these spheroids to best match the observed and computed scattering intensities. The success of this approach can be measured by the fact that predictions of nearly flat phase functions at side scattering angles by size distributions of volume‐equivalent spheroids are borne out in laboratory measurements of natural particles [ Jaggard et al , 1981; Volten et al , 2001], and in the significant improvements between measured and modeled sky radiance when spheroids are used instead of spheres in the case of mineral dust [ Dubovik et al , 2002b]. With these considerations, the agreement between the lidar ratios for mineral dust we predicted using spheroids (i.e., scattering at 180 degrees) and those measured in the field is very encouraging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these devices are reliable and robust, the measurements over large portions of the phase function do not provide much information about particle morphology due to the lack of angular specificity. Second, some studies use moveable detectors along a ring structure such that the phase function can be measured by sweeping the detector (or multiple detectors) across a broad range of angles (Holland and Gagne, 1970;Hovenier et al, 2003;Jaggard et al, 1981;Kuik et al, 1991;Perry et al, 1978;Volten et al, 2001). While this allows for good angular coverage (up to 3-173 • ; Hovenier et al, 2003), the method is generally bulky, must be mechanically stable, and requires a constant population of aerosol particles that does not change appreciably during the detector sweep.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we assume that the particle is spherical for simplicity. When the particle size is micro scale, this simplicity is feasible as explained by Jaggard et al (1981) and Muñoz et al (2006). Table 4 lists the scattering efficiencies of calcite particles at wavelengths of 0.5 m and 10 m.…”
Section: Possibility Of Other Particle Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%