2018
DOI: 10.1364/oe.26.030911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light scattering control in transmission and reflection with neural networks

Abstract: Scattering often limits the controlled delivery of light in applications such as biomedical imaging, optogenetics, optical trapping, and fiber-optic communication or imaging. Such scattering can be controlled by appropriately shaping the light wavefront entering the material. Here, we develop a machine-learning approach for light control. Using pairs of binary intensity patterns and intensity measurements we train neural networks (NNs) to provide the wavefront corrections necessary to shape the beam after the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major benefit includes the flexibility and adaptability in solving complex problems, in which a parametric model is hard to derive and/or prone to errors. Closely related to our work are the learning-based techniques for imaging/focusing through diffusers [16,17,29,33,53]. Unfortunately, all existing networks are only trained and tested on the same diffuser, so the model may still be susceptible to speckle decorrelation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major benefit includes the flexibility and adaptability in solving complex problems, in which a parametric model is hard to derive and/or prone to errors. Closely related to our work are the learning-based techniques for imaging/focusing through diffusers [16,17,29,33,53]. Unfortunately, all existing networks are only trained and tested on the same diffuser, so the model may still be susceptible to speckle decorrelation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, GA is well-suited for optimization problems where the volume of optimization is enormous and there is a fairly ample time [4], [24], [25]. Therefore, it cannot always be suitable to optimize the phase of the large N input modes in the focusing dynamic target where time limit is very important [26], [27].…”
Section: Appling New Genetic Algorithm (Nga) To Phase Mask Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an inverse problem, because it may be easy to deduce the consequence of a particular choice of parameters, but difficult to determine which choice will lead to the desired image. There exist already some limited examples that show, for example, how to train a CNN to focus light deep within turbid media 81 . Yet, the true challenge going forward will be to optimise multi-step imaging strategies: the microscope will observe, make moves that change imaging parameters, and thus play a game with the ultimate goal of gaining the most information about the sample (see Fig.2i).…”
Section: Box 3 Deep Learning As Differential Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%