2009
DOI: 10.1117/3.824746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light Propagation through Biological Tissue and Other Diffusive Media: Theory, Solutions, and Software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
334
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(371 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
334
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that f(z|ρ, t) depends on µ′ s and that this dependence will always be present in all subsequently derived formulas. Instead, thanks to the general properties of the RTE 41,42 , for a homogeneous medium the dependence on μ a vanishes.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that f(z|ρ, t) depends on µ′ s and that this dependence will always be present in all subsequently derived formulas. Instead, thanks to the general properties of the RTE 41,42 , for a homogeneous medium the dependence on μ a vanishes.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DE provides a wide set of approximate analytical solutions of the RTE for various geometries 41,42 . We consider in this section the analytical solutions of the DE for an infinite slab and for this geometry we calculate…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate all the findings discussed in section 6, Monte Carlo simulations have been performed using the code provided by UNIFI (see affiliation list) based on the microscopic BeerLambert method [42,43]. A 3-layer laterally-infinite medium was simulated using two combinations of reduced scattering and thicknesses (Table 2).…”
Section: Validation By Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5b indicated that in the target with a large l a , the light propagation was different from diffusion, and it became difficult for PDE to approximate the light propagation precisely. The error caused by PDE with a homogeneous medium having large l a was discussed previously [41]. It was reported that U calculated with PDE became larger than that with MC simulation as l a increased.…”
Section: Effects Of the Approximations On The Absorbed Light Energymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…H targ (3D PDE, 1 mm) was 67% of H targ (MC, 1 mm). PDE approximates the light propagation well when the light is scattered several times, and scattering randomizes the directions of light propagation [41]. Therefore, PDE did not approximate the MC simulation in the position close to the illuminating position where the laser light conserved the directionality.…”
Section: Effects Of the Approximations On The Absorbed Light Energymentioning
confidence: 99%