2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light penetration, growth, and fruit productivity in ‘Fuji’ apple trees trained to four growing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
17
1
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
17
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The present season's growing conditions have a smaller impact compared to annual crops, as the amount of fruit buds (i.e., production potential) is influenced by crop load [45] and the plants' water status [27,39,46] of the previous growing season [1]. The correlation between production variables and vegetation indices most likely stemmed from the association with vegetative growth and the relationship between vegetative growth, water status and production [14,47,48]. Trees with more vegetative growth produced less flower buds (i.e., decreased number of fruits and total yields), as a result of the considerable consumption of water from excessive vegetative growth [47].…”
Section: Potential and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present season's growing conditions have a smaller impact compared to annual crops, as the amount of fruit buds (i.e., production potential) is influenced by crop load [45] and the plants' water status [27,39,46] of the previous growing season [1]. The correlation between production variables and vegetation indices most likely stemmed from the association with vegetative growth and the relationship between vegetative growth, water status and production [14,47,48]. Trees with more vegetative growth produced less flower buds (i.e., decreased number of fruits and total yields), as a result of the considerable consumption of water from excessive vegetative growth [47].…”
Section: Potential and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although severe shoot pruning was performed, weaken vigor of control plant gave preference to apical dominances outside shoot tips and resulted in more shoots appeared in the outer canopy that thus prevented light penetration inwards. Light intensity had strong relationship with fruit yield, the insufficient light into control canopy decreased flower bud formation followed by fruit yield, which has been also reported in other apple orchards [Jung and Choi 2010]. Root pruning and shoot pruning could more inhibit shoot growth avoiding renewal heading in older apple trees [Saure 2007].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The yield per tree and fruit quality were measured in mid-October. Fruit quality was tested for the firmness with a GY-1 type fruit firmness meter, soluble solid content using a PR-gitalglucose meter and the titratable acid content by titration using 0.1 mol · L -1 NaOH [Jung and Choi 2010].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fruit TSSC values were highest in trees from the zero and three-split application plots, probably due to the higher light intensity inside the tree canopies. Fruit TSSC and fruit peel colour values were positively correlated with the extent of light penetration, which increased inner-canopy photosynthetic activities (Jung & Choi, 2010;Robinson et al, 1983). Fruit PCI values indicate skin colouration levels at maturity and were lowest in single application trees in 2009 (4.48) and 2010 (4.18), which may have been due to the lower light intensity inside the tree canopy.…”
Section: Fruit Production and Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%