2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56338-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light Intensity-dependent Variation in Defect Contributions to Charge Transport and Recombination in a Planar MAPbI3 Perovskite Solar Cell

Abstract: We investigated operation of a planar MAPbI3 solar cell with respect to intensity variation ranging from 0.01 to 1 sun. Measured J-V curves consisted of space-charge-limited currents (SCLC) in a drift-dominant range and diode-like currents in a diffusion-dominant range. The variation of power-law exponent of SCLC showed that charge trapping by defects diminished as intensity increased, and that drift currents became eventually almost ohmic. Diode-like currents were analysed using a modified Shockley-equation m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as shown in Fig. 4d , the photocurrent ( J ph ) with increased illumination intensity ( P ) in both devices follow , where α is regarded as a measure of the efficiency of free charge extraction of the system 48 , 49 . The value of α obtained from the cavity and reference devices is similar, indicating that the change of anode material does not significantly affect in the two systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, as shown in Fig. 4d , the photocurrent ( J ph ) with increased illumination intensity ( P ) in both devices follow , where α is regarded as a measure of the efficiency of free charge extraction of the system 48 , 49 . The value of α obtained from the cavity and reference devices is similar, indicating that the change of anode material does not significantly affect in the two systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, as shown in Figure 4d, the photocurrent (J ph ) with increased illumination intensity (P) in both devices follow ∝ , where α is regarded as a measure of the efficiency of free charge extraction ( ) of the system. 43,44 The value of α obtained from the cavity and reference devices are similar, indicating that the change of anode material does not significantly affect in the two systems. Thus, the enhanced photon-to-current efficiency in the cavity device can be attributed to the increased efficiency of exciton harvesting to interfacial charge transfer states ( ) in the strong coupling regime.…”
Section: A Polaritonic Organic Photodiodementioning
confidence: 70%
“…The low differences (<10%) between JSC from J-V curve and EQE indicate that our photovoltaic measurements are done without critical error [27]. The enhanced performances of PPVs after introducing OABr surface treatment were further explored by measuring the light intensity-dependent photovoltaic parameters, as shown in Figure 2c [28]. The ideality (n) and the power factor (α) of PPVs were extracted using the below equations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%