1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1982.tb03831.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light‐induced Electron Transport Across Semiconductor Electrode/Reaction‐center Film/Electrolyte Interfaces

Abstract: Abstract— Reaction center (RC) complexes isolated from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides R‐26 were dried as a film onto platinum and semiconductor (SnO2) electrodes. The light‐induced primary charge separation which occurs across the biological complex couples electrically with the SnO2 but not with the metal electrode on the time scale of observation. As the working electrode in a two‐electrode photoelectrochemical cell, RC‐coated SnO2 generated photovoltages as high as 80 mV and photo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…87 Thus, the mediocre performance of the orientation with H subunit 70 bound to electrode is attributed to the higher electron tunnelling distance between the electron acceptors and the electrode, owing to the presence of the relatively thick H subunit. 81 A similar account on the importance of the protein orientation to minimize the distance of electron transfer pathway is elucidated by Kondo 75 et al 39 with the study of photoelectrodes modified by RC-LH1 isolated from Rhodopseudomonas palustris, where the orientation of RC complex with the H-chain facing the electrode was found to be more favourable than the opposite orientation. 39 The effect of the dependence of electron transfer kinetics on 80 the distance between the electron acceptor and the electrode has been systematically studied using a series of MHisRCs modified Ni-NTA SAM coated gold electrodes having SAMs of different thicknesses with the number (n) of methylene units in the linker molecule (n= 3,6,10 and 15) being the measure of SAM thickness 85 ( Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Different Orientations Of Rcsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…87 Thus, the mediocre performance of the orientation with H subunit 70 bound to electrode is attributed to the higher electron tunnelling distance between the electron acceptors and the electrode, owing to the presence of the relatively thick H subunit. 81 A similar account on the importance of the protein orientation to minimize the distance of electron transfer pathway is elucidated by Kondo 75 et al 39 with the study of photoelectrodes modified by RC-LH1 isolated from Rhodopseudomonas palustris, where the orientation of RC complex with the H-chain facing the electrode was found to be more favourable than the opposite orientation. 39 The effect of the dependence of electron transfer kinetics on 80 the distance between the electron acceptor and the electrode has been systematically studied using a series of MHisRCs modified Ni-NTA SAM coated gold electrodes having SAMs of different thicknesses with the number (n) of methylene units in the linker molecule (n= 3,6,10 and 15) being the measure of SAM thickness 85 ( Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Different Orientations Of Rcsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…28 The photophysical properties of the pigments are 75 fine-tuned by nature by an elegantly engineered biopolymer material called protein that offers the biological systems the required degree of specificity, efficiency and control to accomplish a biological function. 33 Thus the antenna systems exist as an assemblage of pigment and protein where the 80 photosynthetic pigments are bound to the proteins in highly specific associations to ensue in an effective light absorption.…”
Section: Role Of Light Harvesting Antenna Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the external power conversion efficiency is low when the surface of an electrode is coated with a monolayer of an RC in an electrochemical-based photovoltaic device [3]. The low efficiency is partly due to weak absorption of light in a thin film of RC, and charge transfer between the RC and the electrode is not efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%