2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep15348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-induced cell damage in live-cell super-resolution microscopy

Abstract: Super-resolution microscopy can unravel previously hidden details of cellular structures but requires high irradiation intensities to use the limited photon budget efficiently. Such high photon densities are likely to induce cellular damage in live-cell experiments. We applied single-molecule localization microscopy conditions and tested the influence of irradiation intensity, illumination-mode, wavelength, light-dose, temperature and fluorescence labeling on the survival probability of different cell lines 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
531
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 454 publications
(542 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(74 reference statements)
6
531
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These considerations are critical for long-term time-lapse imaging of living samples and with light-dose-intensive super-resolution techniques. Using longer wavelengths (lower energy) of light is effective [27], but careful consideration of how the light is delivered to the sample in space and time is critical in order to obtain accurate live cell information. Fortunately, discussions of the photo-toxicity of fluorescence microscopes to live samples are becoming more common and researchers are adding new ideas and protocols to lessen the problem [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These considerations are critical for long-term time-lapse imaging of living samples and with light-dose-intensive super-resolution techniques. Using longer wavelengths (lower energy) of light is effective [27], but careful consideration of how the light is delivered to the sample in space and time is critical in order to obtain accurate live cell information. Fortunately, discussions of the photo-toxicity of fluorescence microscopes to live samples are becoming more common and researchers are adding new ideas and protocols to lessen the problem [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimen photodamage due to exposure to light is often a critical issue in biophysical experiments 8 , resulting in photochemical changes to biological processes 8, 9 , modifying structure and growth 10,11 , and ultimately adversely affecting viability 8,11 . For instance, Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These advances illustrate a near-universal feature of precision opti-cal biosensors -that increased light intensities are required to detect smaller molecules or improve spatiotemporal resolution. This increases the photodamage experienced by the specimen, which can have broad consequences on viability 8 , function 9 , structure 10 and growth 11 . It is therefore desirable to develop alternative biosensing approaches that improve sensitivity without exposing the specimen to higher optical intensities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, time-lapse images by STED and RESOLFT are often notable for how little motion is observed, given the long acquisition times. This may be a harbinger of phototoxicity or even light-induced fixation that produces "frozen" cells (8). It is also notable that independent metrics of cell health, such as differential interference contrast (Li et al ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, more sophisticated measures are needed. For example, microtubule growth rates have been shown to decline significantly at a dose of 640-nm irradiation, only 3% of that at which nearly all cells still divide (8). Thus, the development of noninvasive, broadly applicable assays to measure the immediate and local effects of light on cellular physiology should be a major thrust of live-cell imaging research, for diffraction-limited as well as SR methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%