2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1711.07264
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-Head R-CNN: In Defense of Two-Stage Object Detector

Abstract: In this paper, we first investigate why typical two-stage methods are not as fast as single-stage, fast detectors like YOLO [26,27] and SSD [22]. We find that Faster R-CNN [28] and R-FCN [17] perform an intensive computation after or before RoI warping. Faster R-CNN involves two fully connected layers for RoI recognition, while R-FCN produces a large score maps. Thus, the speed of these networks is slow due to the heavy-head design in the architecture. Even if we significantly reduce the base model, the comput… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, a deep network is difficult to deploy on CPU devices (e.g., mobile phones). With the popularity of mobile devices, lightweight network with few parameters has received more and more attention from researchers, such as Light-Head R-CNN [74]. Thus, designing a lightweight network in weakly supervised object detection may be a new research direction.…”
Section: A Model Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a deep network is difficult to deploy on CPU devices (e.g., mobile phones). With the popularity of mobile devices, lightweight network with few parameters has received more and more attention from researchers, such as Light-Head R-CNN [74]. Thus, designing a lightweight network in weakly supervised object detection may be a new research direction.…”
Section: A Model Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table V shows the results of 10 baseline methods in the VisDrone-DET2019 Challenge, i.e., FPN [131], R-FCN [19], Faster R-CNN (FRCNN) [20], SSD [24], Cascade CNN [128], RetinaNet [130], CornetNet [211], RefineNet [212], DetNet [213], and Light Faster R-CNN (Light-RCNN) [214]. The samples are in strict accordance, with 6,471 for training, 548 for validation and 1,580 for testing.…”
Section: A Evaluation Of Object Detection From Uav-borne Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two object detector of this sort are CenterNet [45] and CornerNet-Lite [14], and they both perform very well in terms of efficiency and efficacy. For real-time object detection on CPU or mobile GPU, SSD-based Pelee [37], YOLOv3-based PRN [35], and Light-Head RCNN [17]-based ThunderNet [25] all receive excellent performance on object detection. [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%