ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Posters 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2945078.2945132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light field completion using focal stack propagation

Abstract: Figure 1: Key steps in algorithm: We extract a focal stack from the light field, create a depth map and all-in-focus image, given a user defined mask (center) we first perform image completion on the depth map then the all-in-focus image, finally we propagate the synthesised image segment through the focal stack which can then be used to re-sample the light field.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the propagation of one inpainted view (by an arbitrary method) to the rest of the light field, very few works have been conducted yet to the best of our knowledge. The authors of [21] inpaint an all-in-focus image and propagate it to the light field represented as a focal stack (i.e. set of refocused images) instead of processing directly the light field views.…”
Section: Related Work Light Field Inpaintingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the propagation of one inpainted view (by an arbitrary method) to the rest of the light field, very few works have been conducted yet to the best of our knowledge. The authors of [21] inpaint an all-in-focus image and propagate it to the light field represented as a focal stack (i.e. set of refocused images) instead of processing directly the light field views.…”
Section: Related Work Light Field Inpaintingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable amount of researches focused on depth from focus control for decades [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Most of these methods concentrated on depth from focus/defocus or depth recovery from the focal stack on light field cameras [4,5,9,10]. Using light field cameras has an advantage of capturing simultaneous multiple views with variable focal points which provide more accurate information about the depth of the scene; however, the images are captured in low resolution and in small aperture the value of Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is significantly low [4].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of these cameras along with the mentioned challenges makes them inapplicable for handheld devices such as smartphones. Another disadvantage of light field cameras is the disability in handling occlusion due to the lack of lateral variation being captured in different viewpoints [9].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance visual quality, many approaches have been proposed [8,28,18,6,20,7] to remove the aliasing effects based on view interpolation [6], depth-based filtering [5], or multi-scale fusion [28]. However, since most of them rely on depth estimations [19,4], inaccurate depth maps will cause severe degradation in anti-aliasing performance. Moreover, existing methods aim at removing aliasing artefacts from an individual refocused image, which is corresponding to a specific depth layer in the whole focal stack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%