2013
DOI: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00280.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light‐emitting diode therapy induces analgesia and decreases spinal cord and sciatic nerve tumour necrosis factor‐α levels after sciatic nerve crush in mice

Abstract: Taken together, these data provide first-hand evidence of LEDT effectiveness against neuropathic pain induced by SNC, with corresponding decrease of pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, both in the sciatic nerve and in the spinal cord, although at a small analgesic dose, LEDT failed to accelerate nerve regeneration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when started on the 3rd day after injury, the infrared LED radiation had an effect up to 4 hours after the first treatment and 3 hours after 14 consecutive days of treatment. These results confirm and extend previously obtained results on the therapeutic effect of infrared LED radiation in the control of neuropathic pain …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when started on the 3rd day after injury, the infrared LED radiation had an effect up to 4 hours after the first treatment and 3 hours after 14 consecutive days of treatment. These results confirm and extend previously obtained results on the therapeutic effect of infrared LED radiation in the control of neuropathic pain …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The results of the present study demonstrated that sciatic nerve damage led to the development of mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity that became active from the 3rd and 7th days, extending for 21 days after the injury. Although the basal values of the mechanical stimulus‐induced withdrawal response thresholds recorded in the present work appear to be somewhat different from those described in the literature (which describe lower thresholds), the literature is controversial, and our data corroborate other studies performed with the same species showing higher baseline thresholds …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Here, whole body illumination with GLED for eight hours resulted in antinociception. In contrast, previous studies reported reversal of pain in mice following 30–150 seconds of infrared LED exposure directly touching the skin [15; 16]. The differences in exposure times (seconds versus hours) and “routes of administration” with either direct skin exposure or whole body illumination could result in engagement of different mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Following spinal cord injury, there is evidence suggesting that the M1 response prevails over a more transient M2 response, and this observation has been proposed to contribute to the poor regenerative capacity of the spinal cord following injury [30, 31]. Consistent among various in vitro and in vivo studies, including spinal cord and peripheral nerve injury models, are reports of reduced levels of pro-inflammatory cell mediators, including as IL-6, iNOS, MCP-1, IL-1β and TNFα in response to treatment with various wavelengths including 633 nm [36], 660 nm, 780 nm [37], 810 nm [16] and 950 nm [14]. Coincidently, these pro-inflammatory cell mediators are secreted by M1 cells; thus, we were curious to examine the effect of light treatment on microglia/macrophage populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%