“…However, its defined isotope ratios were slightly different when recalibrated using USGS40 and USGS41. Therefore, to compare the hair isotope values presented in this article with datasets previously published by our research group (for hair: Bowen et al, ; Thompson et al, ; Valenzuela et al, ; for food: Chesson, Ehleringer, & Cerling, ; Chesson et al, ) an offset of −0.3‰ for δ 13 C and +0.2‰ for δ 15 N values should be applied to previous publications. The sulfur isotope ratios of our laboratory reference materials, silver sulfide, and zinc sulfide were +17.9‰ and −31.9‰, respectively, when calibrated against the international standards IAEA‐S‐1, 2 and 3 (–0.30, +22.7 and −32.3‰, respectively).…”