2014
DOI: 10.1134/s1607672914010116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light dependence of slow chlorophyll fluorescence induction in the course of wheat leaf ontogeny

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed ear lier that the ratio F v /F m , characterizing the maximal quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry, under goes only slight (~8%) age dependent changes under normal growth conditions [12,14], whereas the ratio F p /F t (F p and F t are fluorescence intensities at the peak level P and under steady state, respectively [1]) exhib its age dependent changes with an amplitude of at least 40% [14]. Furthermore, the age dependence could be enhanced or weakened depending on the conditions of measurements [7,12,14]. Abbreviations: CFI-chlorophyll fluorescence induction; F 0 and F m -minimal and maximal levels of chlorophyll fluorescence after dark adaptation; and F t -minimal, maximal, and stationary levels of chlorophyll fluorescence in the light adapted state; F p -fluorescence intensity at the peak of CFI curve recorded under actinic illumination after preliminary dark adap tation; F v /F m -the ratio of variable (F v = F m − F 0 ) to maximal (F m ) fluorescence representing the maximal photochemical quantum yield of PSII; NPQ-non photochemical quenching in PSII; PAM-pulse amplitude modulated (fluorometry); PAR-photosynthetically active radiation; PFD-photon flux density; PSI and PSII-photosystem I and II; PSA-photosyn thetic apparatus; qN-coefficient of non photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence; qP-coefficient of pho tochemical quenching of PSII fluorescence; R fd -vitality index; Yield = − F t )/ -effective photochemical quantum yield, i.e., the fraction of light energy used by PSII complexes for electron transport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We showed ear lier that the ratio F v /F m , characterizing the maximal quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry, under goes only slight (~8%) age dependent changes under normal growth conditions [12,14], whereas the ratio F p /F t (F p and F t are fluorescence intensities at the peak level P and under steady state, respectively [1]) exhib its age dependent changes with an amplitude of at least 40% [14]. Furthermore, the age dependence could be enhanced or weakened depending on the conditions of measurements [7,12,14]. Abbreviations: CFI-chlorophyll fluorescence induction; F 0 and F m -minimal and maximal levels of chlorophyll fluorescence after dark adaptation; and F t -minimal, maximal, and stationary levels of chlorophyll fluorescence in the light adapted state; F p -fluorescence intensity at the peak of CFI curve recorded under actinic illumination after preliminary dark adap tation; F v /F m -the ratio of variable (F v = F m − F 0 ) to maximal (F m ) fluorescence representing the maximal photochemical quantum yield of PSII; NPQ-non photochemical quenching in PSII; PAM-pulse amplitude modulated (fluorometry); PAR-photosynthetically active radiation; PFD-photon flux density; PSI and PSII-photosystem I and II; PSA-photosyn thetic apparatus; qN-coefficient of non photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence; qP-coefficient of pho tochemical quenching of PSII fluorescence; R fd -vitality index; Yield = − F t )/ -effective photochemical quantum yield, i.e., the fraction of light energy used by PSII complexes for electron transport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, the extent of this dependence for individual parameters remains poorly examined; in many cases researchers were satisfied by simple comparison of fluorescence characteristics in mature and senescent leaves using rough estimates of leaf age [7][8][9][10][11]13]. We showed ear lier that the ratio F v /F m , characterizing the maximal quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry, under goes only slight (~8%) age dependent changes under normal growth conditions [12,14], whereas the ratio F p /F t (F p and F t are fluorescence intensities at the peak level P and under steady state, respectively [1]) exhib its age dependent changes with an amplitude of at least 40% [14]. Furthermore, the age dependence could be enhanced or weakened depending on the conditions of measurements [7,12,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even now, however, analysis of the literature data (Chermnykh and Kosobrukhov 1987, Loomis et al 1999, Bukhov 2004) and our previous results (Nesterenko et al 2012(Nesterenko et al , 2014 suggest that for C 3 plants, the AL intensity for measuring qN should not be higher than 400 μmol m -2 s -1 PPFD -in order to reduce the effect of the age heterogeneity of leaves. The stability of q N under intensity of actinic light between 400 and 600 μmol m -2 s -1 PPFD may be considered as an indication of leaf maturity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…1B). It is well known that in mature leaves exposed to certain external factors, many of the parameters remain stable (Wang et al 2011, Nesterenko et al 2012, 2014, as all components of the photosynthetic apparatus of mature leaves retain their coordinated function under a wide range of irradiance levels. The high stability of photosynthesis under various lighting conditions is based on a combination of dynamic regulatory light and dark reactions of plants (Bukhov 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation