2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa82bd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light Curves and Spectra from a Unimodal Core-collapse Supernova

Abstract: To assess the effectiveness of optical emission as a probe of spatial asymmetry in core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe), we apply the radiative transfer software, SuperNu, to a unimodal CCSN model. The SNSPH radiation-hydrodynamics software was used to simulate an asymmetric explosion of a 16 M ZAMS binary star. The ejecta has 3.36 M with 0.024 M of radioactive 56 Ni, with unipolar asymmetry along the z-axis. For 96 discrete angular views, we find the ratio between maximum and minimum peak total luminosities is ∼1… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis is somewhat different from that of Wollaeger et al (2017) and Barnes et al (2017), who also conduct non-spherically-symmetric hydrodynamical simulations and then predict band-dependent light curves based on the result. Whereas these authors assume a state of homologous free expansion and conduct Monte Carlo radiative transfer within the ejecta, accounting for radioactive heating, our approach addresses the emission of shock-deposited heat before homologous expansion is established.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Our analysis is somewhat different from that of Wollaeger et al (2017) and Barnes et al (2017), who also conduct non-spherically-symmetric hydrodynamical simulations and then predict band-dependent light curves based on the result. Whereas these authors assume a state of homologous free expansion and conduct Monte Carlo radiative transfer within the ejecta, accounting for radioactive heating, our approach addresses the emission of shock-deposited heat before homologous expansion is established.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Originally intended for supernova transients (van Rossum et al 2016;Kozyreva et al 2017;Wollaeger et al 2017), SuperNu has been applied to modeling kilonovae in 1D and 2D axisymmetric geometry (Kasliwal et al 2017b;Troja et al 2017;Tanvir et al 2017;Evans et al 2017;Wollaeger et al 2018Wollaeger et al , 2019Even et al 2019). These studies varied the mass and velocity of wind and dynamical ejecta components but always assumed a spherical wind superimposed with ejecta from SPH simulations (Rosswog et al 2014).…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there have been several efforts to evaluate the opacity from atomic models. The earliest works attempted the calculation for only a few representative elements (Kasen et al 2013;Tanaka & Hotokezaka 2013;Fontes et al 2017;Wollaeger et al 2017;Tanaka et al 2018), assuming that the overall ejecta opacity can be reflected by these elements. More recently, atomic opacity data for all lanthanides (Z = 58 − 70, Kasen et al 2017;Fontes et al 2020) and finally all the r-process elements (Z = 31 − 88, Tanaka et al 2020) have been calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%