1995
DOI: 10.1002/rrr.3450110206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light availability and growth of wildcelery (Vallisneria americana) in upper Mississippi River backwaters

Abstract: Large beds of Vallisneria americana declined in the backwaters of the Upper Mississippi River after a drought that occurred between 1987 and 1989. One hypothesis for this decline is that low light availability may have decreased net photosynthesis to the extent that overwintering tubers were not formed. Following the decline, light availability remained low. To determine what light levels would be necessary for the re-establishment of Vallisneria in the Upper Mississippi River, the long-term growth of plants i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and 3) may be due to differences in the dominant SAV species (Moore et al 2000) and their habitat requirements (Kemp et al 2004). In the oligohaline zone, Eurasian water milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) are both canopy-forming species, and wild celery (Vallisneria americana) requires 2-9 % of incident light to reach its leaves (Steward 1991;Kimber et al 1995). All three of these dominant oligohaline species are substrate indifferent, growingly equally well in sand or silt bottoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 and 3) may be due to differences in the dominant SAV species (Moore et al 2000) and their habitat requirements (Kemp et al 2004). In the oligohaline zone, Eurasian water milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) are both canopy-forming species, and wild celery (Vallisneria americana) requires 2-9 % of incident light to reach its leaves (Steward 1991;Kimber et al 1995). All three of these dominant oligohaline species are substrate indifferent, growingly equally well in sand or silt bottoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broader understanding of spatial and temporal variation in stressors and SAV responses will help meet the restoration goals for the entire estuary (Batiuk et al 1992(Batiuk et al , 2000 and will help to inform restoration efforts in other systems with complex SAV dynamics. The Chesapeake Bay is a diverse system with 23 SAV species, which differ in substrate preference, morphology, minimum light requirement, heat tolerance, sensitivity to waves and other physical forces, growth rate, and dispersal capability (Bourn 1932, Backman & Barilotti 1976, Congdon & McComb 1979, Goldsborough & Kemp 1988, Steward 1991, Kimber et al 1995, Moore et al 2000, Kemp et al 2004. Dividing the estuary into salinity zones helps account for some of those differences (Moore et al 2000, Orth et al 2010, Patrick et al 2014, 2015 in SAV responses to stressors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fluctuations were caused by variations (D) and (E) represent a limit of 9% surface radiation during sunshine period (Kimber et al, 1995;Dobberfuhl, 2007), the threshold for tuber production in V. americana in irradiance reaching the water surface, water level, attenuation within the water column, and height of the V. spiralis vegetation. Irradiance at the water surface varied strongly from day to day, but ANOVA revealed that it did not vary significantly between years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tuber production requires a higher light intensity. Kimber et al (1995) reported for V. americana a threshold of 5-9% of surface irradiance for tuber production under temperate climatological conditions, which forms the lower limit of the 9% surface irradiance threshold cited for V. americana occurrence in temperate North-Florida (Dobberfuhl, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%