2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep11(2020)017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light- and strange-quark mass dependence of the ρ(770) meson revisited

Abstract: Recent lattice data on ππ-scattering phase shifts in the vector-isovector channel, pseudoscalar meson masses and decay constants for strange-quark masses smaller or equal to the physical value allow us to study the strangeness dependence of these observables for the first time. We perform a global analysis on two kind of lattice trajectories depending on whether the sum of quark masses or the strange-quark mass is kept fixed to the physical point. The quark mass dependence of these observables is extracted fro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a test of the capability of Methods 1 and 2 to describe the K * 0 (700), we get at T = 0 √ s p (1) = (731 ± 7) − i(280 ± 9) MeV and √ s p (2) = (679 ± 6) − i(289 ± 8) MeV, perfectly consistent with precise dispersive calculations [56][57][58], where we have used the subtraction constant in [49] and the Low-Energy Constants (LECs) in [59], as well as their uncertainties, for methods 1 and 2, respectively.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a test of the capability of Methods 1 and 2 to describe the K * 0 (700), we get at T = 0 √ s p (1) = (731 ± 7) − i(280 ± 9) MeV and √ s p (2) = (679 ± 6) − i(289 ± 8) MeV, perfectly consistent with precise dispersive calculations [56][57][58], where we have used the subtraction constant in [49] and the Low-Energy Constants (LECs) in [59], as well as their uncertainties, for methods 1 and 2, respectively.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…As a test of the capability of Methods 1 and 2 to describe the , we get at and , for method 1 and 2, respectively, where we have used the subtraction constant value and error in [ 50 ] for method 1 and the low-energy constants (LECs) of the global fit in [ 57 ] for method 2. For the latter, the uncertainties are computed from the propagation in quadrature of the LEC errors.…”
Section: Properties Of Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bootstrapping has become in the recent past a promising method to assess uncertainties in spectroscopy analyses [56,86,93,100,102,[114][115][116]. In particular, it allows one to map the likelihood for a given minimum, which is not accessi-…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bootstrapping has become in the recent past a promising method to assess uncertainties in spectroscopy analyses [55,83,90,95,97,[109][110][111]. In particular it allows one to map the likelihood for a given minimum, which is not accessible through simple error propagation in non-linear problems, or when the number of parameters is very large.…”
Section: Appendix B: Bootstrap and The γ Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%