1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb01313.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light‐ and phytochrome‐mediated gene expression in Douglas‐fir seedlings

Abstract: In dark‐grown Douglas‐fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] seedlings, the steady‐state level of the major light‐harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding proteins mRNA (cab mRNA) was about 25% of the level that accumulated in light‐grown seedlings. A single, 5‐min irradiance with red light up‐regulated expression transiently, so that cab mRNAs accumulated to a Jevel approaching that determined for light‐grown seedlings. The response was reversible by far‐red light to the dark level, indicating that the up‐regul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In common with angiosperm Lhcb genes, the Lhcb genes studied in P. palustris showed a response to LF light but lacked a significant response in the VLF range, the pattern of response for each P. palustris gene differing from that previously reported for the total family in pea (Kaufman et al, 1984) or for individual family members (White et al, 1995). Like P. palustris, Douglas fir Lhcb sequences hybridizing a coding region probe (which could hybridize transcripts from more than one gene) also showed a classical LF response that was fully reversible by far-red light but only 12 h or more after the light treatments (Alosi and Neale, 1992). Since a VLF response for any family member should have been detectable in these experiments, the Douglas fir Lhcb genes may also lack a VLF response, and it is possible that Lhcb gene expression does not show a VLF response in conifers.…”
Section: Scu Ssl Oncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In common with angiosperm Lhcb genes, the Lhcb genes studied in P. palustris showed a response to LF light but lacked a significant response in the VLF range, the pattern of response for each P. palustris gene differing from that previously reported for the total family in pea (Kaufman et al, 1984) or for individual family members (White et al, 1995). Like P. palustris, Douglas fir Lhcb sequences hybridizing a coding region probe (which could hybridize transcripts from more than one gene) also showed a classical LF response that was fully reversible by far-red light but only 12 h or more after the light treatments (Alosi and Neale, 1992). Since a VLF response for any family member should have been detectable in these experiments, the Douglas fir Lhcb genes may also lack a VLF response, and it is possible that Lhcb gene expression does not show a VLF response in conifers.…”
Section: Scu Ssl Oncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Expression of Lhcb sequences in darkness has been shown to occur in Douglas fir (Alosi et al, 1990), P. thunbergii (Yamamoto et al, 1991(Yamamoto et al, , 1993Kojima et al, 1992), and in members of the Taxodiaceae and Cupressaceaea, which show light-independent chloroplast development (Mukai et al, 1992). In Douglas fir the dark levels of Lhcb mRNA were about 25 to 30% of the light levels (Alosi et al, 1990;Alosi and Neale, 1992). In pines each type of Lhcb apparently showed a similar level and pattern of expression between species.…”
Section: Scu Ssl Onmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recent phylogenetic analyses demonstrate that plant phytochromes were acquired in the last common ancestor of Archaeplastida and that the canonical plant phytochromes originated in an ancestor of streptophytes (Duanmu et al, 2014;Li et al, 2015). Although R/FR photoreversible responses and the distribution of phytochrome genes have been reported in several angiosperms (Mancinelli, 1994), gymnosperms (Alosi and Neale, 1992;Christensen et al, 2002;Mølmann et al, 2006), ferns (Haupt, 1985;Tsuboi et al, 2012), bryophytes (Hartmann and Jenkins, 1984), and charophytes (Weisenseel and Ruppert, 1977;Sokol and Stross, 1992), little is known about the molecular mechanisms of phytochrome signaling apart from those of Arabidopsis. In this study, we found that phytochrome signaling in a liverwort is mediated by a single PIF transcription factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent analysis has shown that light-activated phytochromes interact with the SPA family in a lightdependent manner and promote the dissociation of the COP1/ SPA complex (Lu et al, 2015;Sheerin et al, 2015). Phytochromedependent regulation of gene expression has also been reported in several angiosperms (Sawers et al, 2002;Takano et al, 2005;Kebrom et al, 2006;Takano et al, 2009;Kebrom et al, 2010) and gymnosperms (Alosi and Neale, 1992;Christensen et al, 2002). However, the molecular mechanisms of R-mediated transcriptional regulation in these species are still poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conifers, light-independent expression of photosynthetic genes seems to be a general phenomenon [64]. Lhcb and psbA (photosystem II subunit A) mRNA levels show only small diurnal fluctuations under light/dark cycles and no circadian rhythm under continuous light or dark conditions in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) [65]. By analyzing dark-grown seedlings, expression of Lhcb genes has been shown to occur in darkness in various conifer species [64][65][66][67][68][69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%