1984
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light and electron microscopic identification of nerve terminal sprouting and retraction in normal adult frog muscle.

Abstract: SUMMARY1. A combined light and electron microscopic study was performed on neuromuscular junctions of normal adult frogs.2. In a previous investigation signs ofnew synapse formation, as well as abandoned former synaptic sites, have been observed in normal muscles (Wernig, P6cot-Dechavassine & Stover, 1980a, b). Here we performed a detailed light and electron microscopic correlation to investigate those parts of junctions which, after staining for cholinesterase (ChE) and presynaptic axon terminals, were suspe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the case in mice where the junctions appear stable through early adulthood (Balice-Gordon and Lichtman, 1990), frog junctions show considerable remodeling with seasons of the year, including regression of nerve terminals and SCs from portions of the synaptic contacts, with subsequent turnover of the AChR at the abandoned sites (Anzil et al, 1984). In addition, there is growth of terminals and SCs and deposition of AChR to establish new synaptic sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast to the case in mice where the junctions appear stable through early adulthood (Balice-Gordon and Lichtman, 1990), frog junctions show considerable remodeling with seasons of the year, including regression of nerve terminals and SCs from portions of the synaptic contacts, with subsequent turnover of the AChR at the abandoned sites (Anzil et al, 1984). In addition, there is growth of terminals and SCs and deposition of AChR to establish new synaptic sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In neuromuscular junctions, presynaptic terminals unapposed to postsynaptic specializations (newly formed terminals), and postsynaptic specializations unapposed by presynaptic terminals (regressing synapses) are normally seen (Wemig et al, 1980;Anzil et al, 1984;Wemig and Fisher, 1986), though the molecular mechanisms that might regulate this dynamic process are still unknown. In the present study, we only looked at neuromuscular junctions of third-instar larvae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expect, however, that the extracellular length constant is much shorter at parts of nerve terminal branches with small, isolated synaptic contacts (e.g. ChE rings), since the cleft between the muscle fibre and the Schwann cell is considerably larger outside the immediate synaptic contact (see below and Anzil et al 1984). Differences in the extracellular length constant should also arise from differences in the width of the synaptic gutter, which is bound to be different at terminal branches with different axon diameters (cf.…”
Section: Electrophy8iologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence has been presented in previous investigations that the adult frog neuromuscular junction is not a static structure but continually undergoes some physiological remodelling (Wernig, P6cot-Dechavassine & St6ver, 1980a, b). In the preceding paper (Anzil, Bieser & Wernig, 1984), newly formed synaptic contacts were ascribed to sites which, in the light microscope appeared as small rings ofcholinesterase (ChE) reaction product. Here we report electrophysiological data on spontaneous transmitter release at different points along a single neuromuscular junction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%