2001
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2001.46.1.0086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light absorption and size scaling of light‐limited metabolism in marine diatoms

Abstract: Previous studies have found that the size-scaling exponent of metabolic rates in unicellular algae often deviates from the exponent of Ϫ1/4 usually found for heterotrophs. This study confirms a significant linear relationship between log cell volume (m 3 ) and log intrinsic growth rate (h Ϫ1 ), carbon-normalized photosynthetic capacity and performance (h Ϫ1 ), and carbon-normalized respiratory rate (h Ϫ1 ) for eight marine centric diatoms under nutrientsaturated, light-limited conditions. The intrinsic growth … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
204
4
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(65 reference statements)
22
204
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Light limitation should select for smaller diatoms, which are less susceptible to light limitation due to their higher pigment-specific absorption efficiencies ( Finkel 2001;Finkel et al 2004) and lower sinking rates (Smayda 1970;Huisman & Sommeijer 2002), and which will tend to increase the proportion of the day they spend in the upper sunlit waters compared with larger diatoms (Smol et al 1984). The southeastern Ontario lakes examined in this study have higher nutrient inputs and chlorophyll a concentrations (0.6-8.4 mg m K3 ) than typical oceanic systems (global average: 0.2-0.3 mg m K3 ) or the oligotrophic Lake Tahoe (maximum concentration approx.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light limitation should select for smaller diatoms, which are less susceptible to light limitation due to their higher pigment-specific absorption efficiencies ( Finkel 2001;Finkel et al 2004) and lower sinking rates (Smayda 1970;Huisman & Sommeijer 2002), and which will tend to increase the proportion of the day they spend in the upper sunlit waters compared with larger diatoms (Smol et al 1984). The southeastern Ontario lakes examined in this study have higher nutrient inputs and chlorophyll a concentrations (0.6-8.4 mg m K3 ) than typical oceanic systems (global average: 0.2-0.3 mg m K3 ) or the oligotrophic Lake Tahoe (maximum concentration approx.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some simple allometric trade-offs are imposed (Figure 1b): Phytoplankton in the large size class are distinguished by higher intrinsic maximum growth rates and faster sinking speeds [Laws, 1975]. They also draw parameter values from distributions with higher-nutrient half-saturations (assuming they are less efficient at acquiring nutrients [Gavis, 1976]) and are assumed to be high light adapted due to packaging effects [Ravin and Falkowski, 1997;Finkel, 2001].…”
Section: A4 Dom and Pom Source Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nutrients and light, on phytoplankton population growth depend on body size (Finkel, 2001;Finkel et al, 2004;Irwin et al, 2006). In general, large phytoplankton exhibit a lower photosynthesis rate because of the package effect (Berner et al, 1989) and a lower nutrient uptake rate because of lower surface-to-volume ratio (Kiørboe, 1993).…”
Section: F H Chang Et Al: Scaling Of Growth Rate and Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%