2019
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201801877rr
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ligase 3–mediated end‐joining maintains genome stability of human embryonic stem cells

Abstract: Maintenance of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) with stable genome is important for their future use in cell replacement therapy and disease modeling. Our understanding of the mechanisms maintaining genomic stability of hESC and our ability to modulate them is essential in preventing unwanted mutation accumulation during their in vitro cultivation. In this study, we show the DNA damage response mechanism in hESCs is composed of known, yet unlikely components. Clustered oxidative base damage is converted into… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concurrence of γH2AX and 53BP1 at the DSBs initiates an on-site DSB repair process, which can be detected by colocalized antibody binding [23,35]. The colocalization of 53BP1 and γH2AX foci in cells upon radiation has been found similar to the DSBs repair sites [24,36]. In particular, the phosphorylation of H2AX resulting from DNA damage may enhance the interaction between γH2AX and 53BP1, leading to an increased accumulation of 53BP1 foci at the sites of DSB in IR exposed cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The concurrence of γH2AX and 53BP1 at the DSBs initiates an on-site DSB repair process, which can be detected by colocalized antibody binding [23,35]. The colocalization of 53BP1 and γH2AX foci in cells upon radiation has been found similar to the DSBs repair sites [24,36]. In particular, the phosphorylation of H2AX resulting from DNA damage may enhance the interaction between γH2AX and 53BP1, leading to an increased accumulation of 53BP1 foci at the sites of DSB in IR exposed cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Hence, NHEJ has historically been considered the dominant repair pathway in human cells, while broken DNA end resection is considered the critical factor for determining the pathway of repair and signaling [21]. However, notably, embryonic stem cells are essentially dependent on HR [22][23][24], and HR templated by homologous chromosomes is the predominant repair pathway throughout the cell cycle in these cells in mice [25]. The activity of NHEJ and HR thus evidently depends on additional factors uniformly affecting the cell nucleus (herein referred to as "global factors") ( Figure 1B).…”
Section: Global Versus Local Dsb Repair Pathway Selection and Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activity of NHEJ and HR thus evidently depends on additional factors uniformly affecting the cell nucleus (herein referred to as "global factors") ( Figure 1B). In addition to the cell cycle and cell type, as already mentioned [23,24], the degree of cell differentiation [26], corresponding chromatin condensation [27], genetic background [28][29][30] and physiological status, such as age [31] and hypoxia [32], are the most frequently reported determining factors. For instance, cell differentiation accompanied by chromatin condensation generally suppresses HR in favor of NHEJ but may even completely prevent DSB repair in extreme cases [27].…”
Section: Global Versus Local Dsb Repair Pathway Selection and Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, they do not present a recognizable ligase III, DBB2, XPA, CSA, and RPA3 genes (Passos-Silva et al, 2010). In humans' cells, severe consequences are observed if there is missfunction in ligase III (Kohutova et al, 2019), DDB2 (Yoon et al, 2005), XPA (Messaoud et al, 2012;Manandhar et al, 2017), CSA (D'errico et al, 2007) or RPA3 (Dai et al, 2017) protein. Further, T. cruzi, T. brucei and L. major have duplication of XPB gene (Passos-Silva et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%