2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.09.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ligand-supported Homology Modelling of Protein Binding-sites using Knowledge-based Potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
2
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of virtual screening was estimated by the enrichment for the known ligands among the top-scoring decoy compounds (61,62), generated by the Directory of Useful Decoys protocol (16,18) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of virtual screening was estimated by the enrichment for the known ligands among the top-scoring decoy compounds (61,62), generated by the Directory of Useful Decoys protocol (16,18) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of experimentally determined structures, several successful virtual screening campaigns have been reported 342 based on comparative models of target proteins Warner et al, 2006;Budzik et al, 2010). Efforts have also been made to incorporate information about binding properties of known ligands back into comparative modeling process (Evers et al, 2003;Evers and Klebe, 2004).…”
Section: A Preparation Of a Target Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed approach It is also possible to incorporate knowledge coming from the ligand-based approach or other experimental information, such as mutational data, to refine the modeling procedure and help in selecting the right ligand pose (Yarnitzky et al 2010). For example, Evers et al (2003) proposed a ligand-supported homology modeling procedure in which the models are refined iteratively by including information on active ligands as spatial restraints and optimizing the mutual interactions between the ligands and the binding sites. In the GPCRdock contest, in which a number of groups were asked to predict the 3D structure of the complex of the A2A adenosine receptor with an antagonist (ZM241385) before its publication, the most successful predictions were those using this mixed approach Michino and Abola 2009).…”
Section: Virtual Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%