Ruthenium Complexes 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9783527695225.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ligand Photosubstitution Reactions with Ruthenium Compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we probed the impact of CYP3A4 inhibition in cellinduced toxicity with vinblastine. Complex 9 was compared side-by-side with the [Ru(tpy)(Me 2 dppn)(py)](PF 6 ) 2 complex (27), which generates 1 O 2 just as efficiently 69 but serves as a control by releasing pyridine rather than the CYP3A4 inhibitor 4. Experiments with 27 were important to carry out because prior studies demonstrated that PDT can work synergistically with microtubule-targeting drugs.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, we probed the impact of CYP3A4 inhibition in cellinduced toxicity with vinblastine. Complex 9 was compared side-by-side with the [Ru(tpy)(Me 2 dppn)(py)](PF 6 ) 2 complex (27), which generates 1 O 2 just as efficiently 69 but serves as a control by releasing pyridine rather than the CYP3A4 inhibitor 4. Experiments with 27 were important to carry out because prior studies demonstrated that PDT can work synergistically with microtubule-targeting drugs.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the potential benefits in mind, we identified photocaging as a viable strategy to achieve localized CYP inhibition. Photocaging is a powerful method for blocking the action of biologically active molecules and unleashing inhibitory compounds within desired tissues, through which highly controlled and localized CYP inhibition can be achieved. , Toward this goal, Ru­(II)-based photocaging can facilitate small molecule release in a noninvasive manner to provide spatial and temporal control over biological activity. Photocaging has been exploited in basic research and for drug activation during photochemotherapy (PCT), with recent in vivo validation of Ru­(II)-PCT . In addition to PCT, Ru­(II) complexes show attractive properties for photodynamic therapy (PDT) applications, including high stability and cell permeability, , low inherent toxicity, and higher light-to-dark ratios for cell death compared to clinically approved PDT compounds. , Due to their rich photochemistry and resistance to photobleaching, a common problem with current organic photosensitizers, ruthenium complexes are emerging as a promising new class of PDT agents, , some of which have advanced to clinical trials. One recent example is the Ru­(II) photosensitizer TLD-1433, which is currently in phase II clinical trials for the treatment of bladder cancer. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%