2015
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ligand occupancy in crystal structure of β1-adrenergic G protein–coupled receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One more interesting thing is the identification of a ligand-free basal state of β 1 AR, which was reported by Huang et al in 2013 . This structure was represented as the only class A nonrhodopsin structure crystallized in the ligand-free state; however, it still remains controversial after Leslie et al repeated the structure determination using the deposited structure factors and identified substantial unmodeled electron density for a ligand in the orthosteric pocket. , …”
Section: Progress In Structural Studies Of Class a Nonrhodopsin Gpcrsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One more interesting thing is the identification of a ligand-free basal state of β 1 AR, which was reported by Huang et al in 2013 . This structure was represented as the only class A nonrhodopsin structure crystallized in the ligand-free state; however, it still remains controversial after Leslie et al repeated the structure determination using the deposited structure factors and identified substantial unmodeled electron density for a ligand in the orthosteric pocket. , …”
Section: Progress In Structural Studies Of Class a Nonrhodopsin Gpcrsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…35 This structure was represented as the only class A nonrhodopsin structure crystallized in the ligand-free state; however, it still remains controversial after Leslie et al repeated the structure determination using the deposited structure factors and identified substantial unmodeled electron density for a ligand in the orthosteric pocket. 36,37 The sequence identity between β 1 AR and β 2 AR is approximately 67% in the TM regions. Because of the high sequence identity, the overall structures of the two receptor subtypes in their inactive states are similar.…”
Section: Solved Structures Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%