2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.09.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ligand-induced Conformational Changes in the Bacillus subtilis Chemoreceptor McpB Determined by Disulfide Crosslinking in vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In B. subtilis, no such piston shift has been found. Instead, TM1 is the helix that moves, as shown by disulfide cross-linking experiments, and that movement is a rotation of the helix (18,50). Moreover, the ligand binds within a monomer, in the upper PAS domain, not across the dimeric surface as in the E. coli receptors (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In B. subtilis, no such piston shift has been found. Instead, TM1 is the helix that moves, as shown by disulfide cross-linking experiments, and that movement is a rotation of the helix (18,50). Moreover, the ligand binds within a monomer, in the upper PAS domain, not across the dimeric surface as in the E. coli receptors (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change involves a vertical piston-like shift in the second trans-membrane helix (TM2), linking the sensing domain to the cytoplasmic region (8,16,17). Recent work in B. subtilis has shown that a different mechanism, a rotation of the first trans-membrane helix (TM1) without a piston movement, occurs upon attractant binding, illustrating a fundamental difference in the mechanism for receptor activation in these two species (18 histidine residue as possibly being important for function (19 (20). In addition to these studies, recent structures of the periplasmic binding domains of both the Klebsiella pneumoniae CitA citrate sensor and the E. coli DcuS fumarate sensor showed that an extracellular PAS domain was involved in ligand binding for these two-component sensor kinases (21,22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding of an effector molecule to the sensor domain induces sliding and/or rotational movement of the transmembrane four-helix bundle that connects the periplasmic sensor domain with the cytoplasmic signaling domain. This movement is considered to be a key step in the signal transduction mechanism of MCP (39,40). Although HemAT-Bs lacks the transmembrane region, the G-and H-helices of the two subunits form an antiparallel four-helix bundle, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Insights Into Signal Transduction Mechanism Of Hemat-bs-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conformational changes of G-helix residues are quite important for the signal transduction mechanism of HemAT-Bs, as discussed below. The signal transduction mechanism has been proposed for MCPs, which are membrane-bound proteins (42,43). A pair of two antiparallel helices in a MCP dimer forms a transmembrane four-helix bundle that connects the periplasmic sensor domain and the cytoplasmic signaling domain.…”
Section: Effects Of Mutations Of Thr 95 and His 86 On The O 2 -Inducementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pair of two antiparallel helices in a MCP dimer forms a transmembrane four-helix bundle that connects the periplasmic sensor domain and the cytoplasmic signaling domain. The binding of the effector molecule to the sensor domain induces a slide and/or rotational movement of this helix bundle, which is a key step in the signal transduction mechanism of MCPs (42,43).…”
Section: Effects Of Mutations Of Thr 95 and His 86 On The O 2 -Inducementioning
confidence: 99%