2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ligand dependent gene regulation by transient ERα clustered enhancers

Abstract: Unliganded Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) has been implicated in ligand-dependent gene regulation. Upon ligand exposure, ERα binds to several EREs relatively proximal to the premarked, unliganded ERα-bound sites and affects transient but robust gene expression. However, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Here we demonstrate that upon ligand stimulation, persistent sites interact extensively, via chromatin looping, with the proximal transiently ERα-bound sites, forming Ligand Dependent ERα Enhan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(108 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the SCR is presumed to strongly activate target genes due to the combinatorial action of its composite transcription factor binding sites. However, the functional significance of “superenhancers” compared with nonclustered enhancers is markedly debated, with previous genetic dissections uncovering context-dependent transcriptional effects that may be functionally redundant or additive, but not synergistic ( Hay et al 2016 ; Moorthy et al 2017 ; Saravanan et al 2020 ; for discussion, see Blobel et al 2021 ). Although the 7.3-kb-long SCR contains four regions, each bound by more than six different transcription factors, we found that only two of these regions (SRR107 and SRR111) account for the vast majority of Sox2 transcription activation in cis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the SCR is presumed to strongly activate target genes due to the combinatorial action of its composite transcription factor binding sites. However, the functional significance of “superenhancers” compared with nonclustered enhancers is markedly debated, with previous genetic dissections uncovering context-dependent transcriptional effects that may be functionally redundant or additive, but not synergistic ( Hay et al 2016 ; Moorthy et al 2017 ; Saravanan et al 2020 ; for discussion, see Blobel et al 2021 ). Although the 7.3-kb-long SCR contains four regions, each bound by more than six different transcription factors, we found that only two of these regions (SRR107 and SRR111) account for the vast majority of Sox2 transcription activation in cis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1D and Supplemental Fig.1E). Residual GREB1 expression may result from multiple regulatory regions coordinating GREB1 expression in E2 treated cells (Saravanan et al, 2020). Deletion of the NRIP1 enhancer led to almost total loss of NRIP1 induction in response to E2 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1E). Residual GREB1 expression may result from multiple regulatory regions coordinating GREB1 expression in E2 treated cells (Saravanan et al, 2020).…”
Section: + E2 5mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the SCR is presumed to strongly activate target genes due to the combinatorial action of its composite transcription factor binding sites. However, the functional significance of “super-enhancers” compared to non-clustered enhancers is markedly debated, with previous genetic dissections uncovering context-dependent transcriptional effects that may be functionally redundant or additive, but not synergistic (Hay et al, 2016; Moorthy et al, 2017; Saravanan et al, 2020; discussed in Blobel et al, 2021). Although the 7.3 kb-long SCR contains four regions, each bound by more than six different transcription factors, we found that only two of these regions (SRR107 and SRR111) account for the vast majority of Sox2 transcription regulation in cis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%