2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-43195-2_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ligament Shear Wave Speeds Are Sensitive to Tensiometer-Tissue Interactions: A Parametric Modeling Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between the transducer input and first measurement location, the wave is free to displace the tendon. Once the wave reaches the first location, the tendon motion is subject to the response of the tendon–sensor system combined, and this behavior is measured at the second measurement location [ 21 ]. By limiting the measurement to a single point, the measured response is closer to the unobstructed tendon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between the transducer input and first measurement location, the wave is free to displace the tendon. Once the wave reaches the first location, the tendon motion is subject to the response of the tendon–sensor system combined, and this behavior is measured at the second measurement location [ 21 ]. By limiting the measurement to a single point, the measured response is closer to the unobstructed tendon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our numerical experiments showed that the uncertainty in travel time could be estimated from the strength of correlation ( Figure 5 ), a relationship that was used to describe the noise processes in the Kalman filter model. Further study is needed to investigate non-noise processes more fully, e.g., dispersion, that can contribute to decorrelation from in situ tensiometry measurements [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of this controlled force was set to minimally influence the shear wave speeds. 32 We measured the controlled force of each component using a load cell (LC101, Omegadyne Inc., with reported linearity = 0.25 N). The piezoelectric tapping device (PK4JQP1, Thorlabs Inc, Newton, NJ) induced shear waves in each specimen by delivering 20-μm impulsive taps across the width of the ligament at a tap rate of 10 Hz.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we mounted the three components of the shear wave tensiometer, which housed the piezoelectric tapping device and two accelerometers, in a 3D‐printed structure that pressed each component against the outer surface of the ligament with a controlled force of 1.4 ± 0.2 N (Figure 1). The level of this controlled force was set to minimally influence the shear wave speeds (i.e., maintain coupled transverse motion of the accelerometers and the ligament with minimal alteration of the local stresses) 34 . We measured the controlled force of each component using a load cell (LC101; Omegadyne Inc., with reported linearity = 0.25 N).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation