Lifting the discrepancy between experimental results and the theoretical predictions for the catalytic activity of RuO2 (110) towards Oxygen Evolution Reaction

Abstract

Developing new efficient catalyst materials for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is essential for widespread proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer use. Both RuO2 (110) and IrO2 (110) have been shown to be highly active OER catalysts, however DFT predictions have been unable to explain the high activity of RuO2. We propose that this discrepancy is due to RuO2 utilizing a different reaction pathway, as compared to the conventional IrO2 pathway. This hypothesis is supported by comparisons between experimental data, DFT data and the proposed reaction model. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the reaction pathway utilized by RuO2 (110) might be pH dependent, following the conventional pathway at high pH.

The low overpotential regime of acidic water oxidation part II: trends in metal and oxygen stability numbers

“…The only difference is that we have drawn the peroxide intermediate, *OOH, with the hydrogen atom abstracted to a neighboring surface-bound oxygen atom, as has been proposed to take place on Ru(110), stabilizing this intermediate and lowering the OER overpotential. 29,41,42 We have labelled the peroxide intermediate as the ''active state'' or S RDS , *O as S RDS-1 , and *OH as S RDS-2 based on the analysis in the first article of this series. 35 The destabilized state that we propose as the link between labelled oxygen evolution and metal dissolution is indicated at the start of the middle row.…”