Lifting a Metadata Model to the Semantic Multimedia World

Martens, Gaëtan; Verborgh, Ruben; Poppe, Chris; Walle, Rik Van de

doi:10.3745/jips.2011.7.1.199

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Van Deursen et al (2008) propose another generic approach, which employs a mapping file to build connection between XML schema and OWL ontology and further helps transform XML records to RDF instances. Martens et al (2011) introduce a procedure to convert an XML‐based metadata schema to an OWL ontology using the example of DIG35, a metadata standard of describing still images. They automate the converting process by using a tool that maps XML to RDF based on an XML document.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

From metadata to ontology representation: A case of converting severe weather forecast metadata to an ontology

Chen¹,

Plale²

2012

Proc of Assoc for Info

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the increasing amount of data generated in geoscience research, it becomes critical to describe data sets in meaningful ways. A large number of described data sets are described using XML metadata, which has proved a useful means of expressing data characteristics. An ontological representation is another way of representing data sets with the benefit of providing rich semantics, convenient linkage to other data sets, and good interoperability with other data. This study represents geoscience data sets as an ontology based on an existing metadata description and on the nature of the data set. It takes the case of Vortex2 data, a regional weather forecast data set collected in Summer 2010, to showcase how forecast data can be represented in ontology by using the existing metadata information. It supplies another type of representation of the data set with added semantics and potential functionalities compared to the previous metadata representation.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

From metadata to ontology representation: A case of converting severe weather forecast metadata to an ontology

Chen¹,

Plale²

2012

Proc of Assoc for Info

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) 5 Darwin Core (DwC) standard [5] defines the most widely used vocabulary for describing biodiversity resources 6 . Over 467 million occurrence records of the 533 million aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) 7 have been described using Darwin Core terms. In contrast to the vocabularies mentioned above, the DwC vocabulary was primarily designed to facilitate the sharing of data in simple single-table text files and was not specifically intended for use in RDF.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Adapting existing metadata vocabularies and datasets for use in the Semantic Web is a current challenge. [7] [8] [9] This paper describes how the Task Group adapted a vocabulary that was not designed specifically for use in RDF so that its terms could be used as RDF predicates in a consistent manner. In Section 2 of this paper, we describe each of the major issues (Box 1) and how they were resolved.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lessons learned from adapting the Darwin Core vocabulary standard for use in RDF

Baskauf

Wieczorek

Deck³

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Darwin Core vocabulary is widely used to transmit biodiversity data in the form of simple text files. In order to support expression of biodiversity data in the Resource Description Framework (RDF), a guide was created as a non-normative addition to the Darwin Core standard. This paper describes the major issues that were addressed in the creation of the guide, particularly problems related to adapting terms designed to have literal values for use with IRI references. By making it possible to express millions of existing records as RDF, the guide is an important step towards enabling the biodiversity informatics community to participate in broader Linked Data and Semantic Web efforts.

show abstract

Trends in Managing Multimedia Semantics

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reviews various efforts to define and capture the semantics of multimedia data. These efforts are particularly relevant to the problem of storing, managing and querying the semantic content of such data. Since there is not yet an accepted solution to the problem of how to represent, organize and manage multimedia data and the related semantics by means of a formal framework, this paper aims at providing some major research trends in this area. The focus is on ontologies, which allow the exchange of semantics of multimedia content between distributed information systems. This paper aims at reporting on recent trends in the development of multimedia ontologies.

show abstract

Lifting a Metadata Model to the Semantic Multimedia World

Abstract: Abstract

Cited by 4 publications

References 13 publications

From metadata to ontology representation: A case of converting severe weather forecast metadata to an ontology

From metadata to ontology representation: A case of converting severe weather forecast metadata to an ontology

Lessons learned from adapting the Darwin Core vocabulary standard for use in RDF

Trends in Managing Multimedia Semantics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About