Lifetime prevalence, correlates, and persistence of oppositional defiant disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication

Nock, Matthew K.; Kazdin, Alan E.; Hiripi, Èva; Kessler, Ronald C.

doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01733.x

Cited by 447 publications

(323 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

297

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These results are in line with findings on previous waves of this study [8], and with studies reporting associations between oppositional and adult psychopathology even after control for co-occurring conduct problems [23,30]. One possible explanation to these findings could be that these two externalizing behavior types comprise behaviors that are primarily reactive, non-destructive and affective behaviors and entail negative emotionality (e.g.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Predicting adult emotional and behavioral problems from externalizing problem trajectories in a 24-year longitudinal study

Reef

Diamantopoulou

Meurs

et al. 2010

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to examine the prediction of adult behavioral and emotional problems from developmental trajectories of externalizing behavior in a 24-years longitudinal population-based study of 2,076 children. The adult psychiatric outcome of these trajectories has not yet been examined. Trajectories of the four externalizing behavior types: aggression, opposition, property violations and status violations were determined separately through latent class growth analysis using data of five waves, covering ages 4-18 years. We used regression analyses to determine the associations between children's trajectories and adults' psychiatric problems based on the Adult Self-Report. The developmental trajectories of the four types of externalizing behavior mostly predicted intrusive, aggressive and rule-breaking behavior in adulthood. Non-destructive behaviors in childhood such as opposition and status violations predict adult problems to a larger extent than destructive behaviors such as aggression and property violations. In general, children who develop through high-level trajectories are likely to suffer from both internalizing and externalizing problem behavior in adulthood, regardless the direction of change (i.e. increasing/decreasing/persisting) of the high-level trajectory. We can conclude that the level rather than the developmental change of externalizing behavior problems has a larger impact on adult outcome.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Predicting adult emotional and behavioral problems from externalizing problem trajectories in a 24-year longitudinal study

Reef

Diamantopoulou

Meurs

et al. 2010

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Besides, the diagnostic approach on oppositional defiant disorder in the preschool and primary school years has yielded prevalence rates ranging from 7.4 to 10.5 %. These results are consistent with the lifetime prevalence of ODD reported by Nock et al (2007), who found a rate of 10.2 %. Prevalence estimates in previous studies have yielded a wide range from 2 -15% (e.g.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

The Epidemiology of Child Psychopathology: Basic Principles and Research Data

Kuschel¹

2012

Epidemiology Insights

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is one of the most prevalent childhood disorders (Nock, Kazdin, Hiripi, & Kessler, 2007). Children and youth with ODD experience irritability, significant conflict with others, poor self-control, anger, and vengeance toward others that impairs their functioning in one or more life domains (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013).…”

Section: Disorder Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Reasoning in the Assessment and Planning for Intervention for Oppositional Defiant Disorder

Wilcox

Heudes

2016

Canadian Journal of School Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clinical reasoning requires thoughtful consideration of a variety of factors that contribute to the conceptualization of a case such as the reason for referral, school information, home environment, assessment outcomes, and behavioural observations made during assessments. The purpose of this article is to provide the reader with insight into the clinical reasoning involved in the assessment and intervention planning for an adolescent with oppositional defiant disorder. The reader will be guided through the authors' conceptualization of this case and suggestions for intervention.

show abstract

Lifetime prevalence, correlates, and persistence of oppositional defiant disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication

Cited by 447 publications

References 50 publications

Predicting adult emotional and behavioral problems from externalizing problem trajectories in a 24-year longitudinal study

Predicting adult emotional and behavioral problems from externalizing problem trajectories in a 24-year longitudinal study

The Epidemiology of Child Psychopathology: Basic Principles and Research Data

Clinical Reasoning in the Assessment and Planning for Intervention for Oppositional Defiant Disorder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About