2021
DOI: 10.1002/cend.202100009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime predictions of prestressed concrete bridges—Evaluating parameters of relevance using Sobol' indices

Abstract: The residual structural lifetime of concrete bridges is often limited by fatigue of the prestressing steel. In practice, numerical calculations of the structure are combined with Miner's rule—based on load frequencies and stress amplitudes—to estimate the damage. Thereby, various parameters must be accounted for whereof a few are actually relevant. Structural monitoring is valuable to increase the accuracy of lifetime predictions, but usually experts choose the right parameters on experience only. A more objec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to qualitative methods, so-called screening methods [45] require significantly fewer evaluations. Typically, they are used to identify decisive or less relevant parameters, for example, to reduce complex models [46]. Subsequently, a quantitative sensitivity analysis can be carried out in a then reduced design space [41].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis Of Modular Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison to qualitative methods, so-called screening methods [45] require significantly fewer evaluations. Typically, they are used to identify decisive or less relevant parameters, for example, to reduce complex models [46]. Subsequently, a quantitative sensitivity analysis can be carried out in a then reduced design space [41].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis Of Modular Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, other sensitivity analysis techniques, e.g., sensitivity-based total effects [50], require N•(k + 2) simulations, in which the sample size N varies between a few hundreds to thousands and more depending on the model under investigation [41]. Already with N = 100, which is still much too low for reliable results [46], the EE method requires more than 10 times fewer simulations. This is why the EE method is adapted for the analysis of relevant module positions that mainly cause deformations on an overall structure.…”
Section: Sensitivity-based Permutation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%