2010
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/5/053023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime of electronic excitations in metal nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21, where shorter lifetimes are found based on spherical jellium model calculations. The difference could be attributed to the definition of the QP excitation energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21, where shorter lifetimes are found based on spherical jellium model calculations. The difference could be attributed to the definition of the QP excitation energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In Ref. 21, it is defined as |ǫ i − ǫ f |, while for the nano-clusters in this article, it is defined as |E i − E f |, which can be approximated as |E i − ǫ i | + |ǫ i − ǫ f |. The GW correction term |E i − ǫ i | vanishes in infinite uniform electron gas, yet it could be a large number in finite systems and also strongly size-dependent, as can be seen in Table I.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion, however, does not apply to other systems in the nanoscale. Recent calculations of electron lifetimes in metal nanoparticles showed that, for particle sizes up to a few nanometers, the lifetime does not depend much on size (49,50). Still, the lifetime value is surprisingly different from the bulk limit.…”
Section: Confinement Effects In Electron Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the lifetime value is surprisingly different from the bulk limit. This fact can be explained in terms of the partial localization of the electron excitation in the vicinity of the surface (50).…”
Section: Confinement Effects In Electron Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V, where we will conclude that they should be important only for cases in which "normal" mechanisms are low. Considering other possible size-dependent effects, 26,29 there could be changes of the surface density of states with size; the hot electron lifetime varies in an energy-dependent way with size; 48 we cannot exclude that the adsorption sites and states change when going to small NPs, with steps and edges becoming important. All these influences are made improbable by the finding that the dynamics of the desorption appear to be constantthis is deduced from final state energy distributions, as will be described in Sec.…”
Section: No Desorption By Nanosecond Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 99%