2021
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1931527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime attributable cancer risk related to prevalent CT scan procedures in pediatric medical imaging centers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for the ≤15 years old pediatric patients. [ 41 ] This discrepancy may stem from differences in the radiation dose measurement methods and the scan settings used (kVp, mAs, and pitch). Bismuth shields have been used to reduce radiation exposure of the eyes in pediatric brain CT.[ 19 42 ] In our study, a bismuth shield with a 1-cm shield-to-eyelid spacer decreased the eye dose by 28% relative to the reference scan, that is consistent with others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for the ≤15 years old pediatric patients. [ 41 ] This discrepancy may stem from differences in the radiation dose measurement methods and the scan settings used (kVp, mAs, and pitch). Bismuth shields have been used to reduce radiation exposure of the eyes in pediatric brain CT.[ 19 42 ] In our study, a bismuth shield with a 1-cm shield-to-eyelid spacer decreased the eye dose by 28% relative to the reference scan, that is consistent with others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can cause harmful biological and health effects such as hair loss, illness and cancer [4]. Some may argue that the radiation from commercial CT scans will not have any serious effects on the patients, however, the rapid increase of CT application has already contributed to the global annual cumulative ionizing radiation dose by 34% [5]. For minimizing the risks, an effective way is to deliver lesser X-rays to the patient i.e.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have addressed the LAR of cancer incidence and mortality from low- and standard-dose chest CT scans [ 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 97 , 98 ]. From Table 4 and Table 5 , it is evident that the effective dose resulting from a low-dose chest CT for COVID-19 is much lower than that from standard-dose chest CT (0.20–1.8 mSv Vs. 2.20–8.70 mSv).…”
Section: Low- and Standard-dose Chest Ct In Covid-19: Radiation Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pooled analysis of seven cohort studies assessing thyroid cancer after exposure to external radiation supports thyroid cancer increase at 10–90 mSv doses [ 103 ]. Overall, it is estimated that a standard-dose chest CT may increase the risk of breast cancer by 20–287 [ 89 , 90 , 92 , 97 , 98 ] and lung cancer by 22–152 [ 90 , 91 , 97 , 98 ] per 100,000 people.…”
Section: Low- and Standard-dose Chest Ct In Covid-19: Radiation Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%