2019
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2019.2926663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime Absolute Calibration of the EO-1 Hyperion Sensor and its Validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…usgs.gov, accessed on 1 December 2018) over Cluster 13, and pixels containing more than 10 percent of cloud pixels are discarded, along with t images with a 5 degrees look angle or greater, as described by Shrestha et al [25]. A total of 213 hyperspectral images were obtained and were drift-corrected, along with absolute gain and bias correction [26]. Figure 2 shows the hyperspectral profiles extracted from Hyperion to estimate the hyperspectral profile of Cluster 13, where the yellow dots represent the mean hyperspectral signature.…”
Section: Estimation Of Spectral Band Adjustment Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…usgs.gov, accessed on 1 December 2018) over Cluster 13, and pixels containing more than 10 percent of cloud pixels are discarded, along with t images with a 5 degrees look angle or greater, as described by Shrestha et al [25]. A total of 213 hyperspectral images were obtained and were drift-corrected, along with absolute gain and bias correction [26]. Figure 2 shows the hyperspectral profiles extracted from Hyperion to estimate the hyperspectral profile of Cluster 13, where the yellow dots represent the mean hyperspectral signature.…”
Section: Estimation Of Spectral Band Adjustment Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the relative stability between different channels of Hyperion is at least 5% for the VNIR region and 10% for the SWIR region. Recently, Jing et al [17] derived a set of calibration gain and bias coefficients from reflectance-based vicarious calibration at the South Dakota State University vegetative site and available in-situ Radiometric Calibration Network (RadCalNet) data from the Railroad Valley site.…”
Section: Hyperion Sensor Description and Previous Radiometric Calibramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ρ λ is the TOA reflectance of different bands (λ) of Hyperion, Yr is the decimal year representing the acquisition date and overpass time, ρ λ, drift_cor is the Hyperion TOA profile after yearly drift correction, and %drift λ year is the percent yearly drift of band λ estimated from (1). For gain and bias correction, the latest set of calibration coefficients reported by Jing et al [17] should be applied after performing the drift correction:…”
Section: Drift Correction and Calibration Gain/bias Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations