2014
DOI: 10.1089/brain.2013.0155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifespan Differences in Cortico-Striatal Resting State Connectivity

Abstract: Distinctive cortico-striatal circuits that serve motor and cognitive functions have been recently mapped based on resting state connectivity. It has been reported that age differences in cortico-striatal connectivity relate to cognitive declines in aging. Moreover, children in their early teens (i.e., youth) already show mature motor network patterns while their cognitive networks are still developing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(75 reference statements)
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the EEG-derived fractal dimension measure is sensitive to a parabolic development of neural efficiency over the life-span. Accordingly, this parabolic maturation of neural capacity over the lifespan is also shown by other brain measures, for example by the inverted U-shaped development of connectivity of cognitive and motor frontal-striatal networks [ 42 ], of the optimal balance between local and global neural plasticity [ 43 ], of brain weight and of white matter volume [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These results suggest that the EEG-derived fractal dimension measure is sensitive to a parabolic development of neural efficiency over the life-span. Accordingly, this parabolic maturation of neural capacity over the lifespan is also shown by other brain measures, for example by the inverted U-shaped development of connectivity of cognitive and motor frontal-striatal networks [ 42 ], of the optimal balance between local and global neural plasticity [ 43 ], of brain weight and of white matter volume [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The changes in connectivity between the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex are broadly consistent with this finding. However, developmental investigations of other functional networks have demonstrated increased connectivity from childhood and adolescence into adulthood in the default mode network (Supekar et al, 2010) and in striatal-cortical functional networks (Bo et al, 2014). Thus, though our findings are consistent with the literature on cerebellar structural development (Bernard et al, 2015; Tiemeier et al, 2010a) and development of prefrontal resting state networks (Kelly et al, 2009), patterns of functional network connectivity seems to differ based on the networks and seed regions in question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to motor-related networks, stronger connectivity, albeit nonsignificant, was observed as a function of age within the dorsal somatomotor network whereas weaker connectivity was observed with older age within the ventral somatomotor network (P-uncorrected < 0.05 but did not survive FDR correction). This suggests that age-related modulations of connectivity within motor-related networks are dependent on the specific regions included as part of a motor network and thus help explain the heterogeneity in the available literature (Wu, Zang, Wang, Long, Hallett, et al 2007;Tomasi and Volkow 2012;Bo et al 2014;Solesio-Jofre et al 2014;Song et al 2014;Geerligs et al 2015;Seidler et al 2015).…”
Section: Age-related Modulations Of Inter-and Intranetwork Resting Stmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These networks are known to change substantially with age, with a decrease in connectivity within the default mode network being the most commonly reported finding (Andrews-Hanna et al 2007;Damoiseaux et al 2008;Tomasi and Volkow 2012;Ferreira and Busatto 2013;Geerligs et al 2015;Ferreira et al 2016). Investigations into age-related changes within motor resting state networks have revealed both increased and decreased connectivity, heterogeneous results that appear to be at least partially attributed to the specific brain regions included as part of the networks of interest (Wu, Zang, Wang, Long, Hallett, et al 2007;Tomasi and Volkow 2012;Bo et al 2014;Solesio-Jofre et al 2014;Song et al 2014;Geerligs et al 2015;Seidler et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%