2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifecycle carbon implications of conventional and low-energy multi-storey timber building systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Fig. 5, while 1 kg wood can store 9 kg CO 2 , the rest of building construction materials positively contribute to the CO 2 emissions, particularly the aluminium has a significant footprint on the environment by releasing 27 kg CO 2 per kg [79,80].…”
Section: Building Future Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As seen in Fig. 5, while 1 kg wood can store 9 kg CO 2 , the rest of building construction materials positively contribute to the CO 2 emissions, particularly the aluminium has a significant footprint on the environment by releasing 27 kg CO 2 per kg [79,80].…”
Section: Building Future Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other vertical farms have been built in Korea, Japan, the USA and Sweden [98-100, 102]. Singapore, one [79,80] of the most densely populated countries, is considering a futuristic "floating vertical farm" designed by Forward Thinking Lab of Barcelona [103]. The system basically consists of looping towers that could float in local harbours, providing new space for year-round crops.…”
Section: Feeding Future Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a district heated building the delivered district heat is metered at the heat exchanger. Here, there is a heat loss of about 5% [39] which is not used in the building as the heat exchanger is usually located at a place without any need for heat. Hence, the heat demand of the Pr-DH or Gr-DH buildings is estimated to be 95% of the delivered district heat.…”
Section: Final Energy Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies on the properties of CLT have shown that CLT construction has advantages in fire resistance, thermal performance, and the potential for carbon sequestration in the building structure [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Other studies indicates that CLT buildings are structurally sound against the risk of collapse under a Maximum Credible Earthquake [34].…”
Section: Timbermentioning
confidence: 99%