2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10914-015-9305-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life in Burrows Channelled the Morphological Evolution of the Skull in Rodents: the Case of African Mole-Rats (Bathyergidae, Rodentia)

Abstract: African mole-rats are fossorial rodents that consist of five chisel-tooth digging genera (Heterocephalus, Heliophobius, Georychus, Fukomys, and Cryptomys) and one scratch digger (Bathyergus). They are characterized by striking physiological, morphological, and behavioral adaptations intimately related to their subterranean life. The influence of their mode of life in shaping the cranial morphology has yet to be evaluated in comparison to other Ctenohystrica, especially fossorial genera, which include the subte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…chisel-tooth digging in Fukomys and scratch digging in Bathyergus [2]. Previous studies of subterranean rodents have indicated that digging behaviour has a major impact on cranial morphology [15,16] and that chisel-tooth digging species have adaptations for high bite force and wide gape [6,10]. The cranial morphology of the chisel-tooth digger in this analysis is clearly able to function well at wide gapes, and, although absolute bite force cannot be predicted with any degree of confidence by our unvalidated models, increasing the efficiency of the masticatory system would necessarily increase bite force.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…chisel-tooth digging in Fukomys and scratch digging in Bathyergus [2]. Previous studies of subterranean rodents have indicated that digging behaviour has a major impact on cranial morphology [15,16] and that chisel-tooth digging species have adaptations for high bite force and wide gape [6,10]. The cranial morphology of the chisel-tooth digger in this analysis is clearly able to function well at wide gapes, and, although absolute bite force cannot be predicted with any degree of confidence by our unvalidated models, increasing the efficiency of the masticatory system would necessarily increase bite force.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is as predicted by the third hypothesis and fits with the digging behaviour of these two species. It appears that in Fukomys the morphology of the cranium leads to reduced deformation at the wide gapes necessary for chisel-tooth digging [6,10]. Bathyergus , as a scratch digger [2], does not employ such wide gapes as frequently, and thus its cranial morphology deforms least at narrower gapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convergence of ecology and morphology is especially well documented for rodents living on different continents (Wood 1947; Samuels and van Valkenburgh ; Rodrigues et al. ). Wood (, p. 250) once observed “‘Parallelism, parallelism, more parallelism and still more parallelism’ is the evolutionary motto of the rodents.”…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most rodents have generalized diets, highly specialized forms, such as strict carnivores, insectivores, and herbivores, can show convergence in morphology (Samuels 2009;Rowe et al 2016). The convergence of ecology and morphology is especially well documented for rodents living on different continents (Wood 1947;Samuels and van Valkenburgh 2008;Rodrigues et al 2015). Wood (1935, p. 250) once observed "'Parallelism, parallelism, more parallelism and still more parallelism' is the evolutionary motto of the rodents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To elucidate the functional significance of any morphological variation between red squirrel populations, the mechanical advantage (MA) of three of the major jaw-closing muscles – temporalis, superficial masseter, and deep masseter – was estimated from linear measurements of the jaw (following Casanovas-Vilar and van Dam, 2013; Gomes Rodrigues et al 2016). MA was calculated as the ratio of the muscle in-lever to the biting out-lever.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%