2004
DOI: 10.2307/3473237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life-History Variation Predicts the Effects of Demographic Stochasticity on Avian Population Dynamics

Abstract: Comparative analyses of avian population fluctuations have shown large interspecific differences in population variability that have been difficult to relate to variation in general ecological characteristics. Here we show that interspecific variation in demographic stochasticity, caused by random variation among individuals in their fitness contributions, can be predicted from a knowledge of the species' position along a "slow-fast" gradient of life-history variation, ranging from high reproductive species wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
98
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(46 reference statements)
7
98
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This might hold particularly for oystercatchers, which seem to have a low environmental variance of population growth compared with other avian species [57]. More generally, the relative importance of environmental and demographic stochasticity on dynamics is expected to vary between species as a function of general life-history properties [57]. Demographic noise is not necessarily completely white, as individual heterogeneity can cause demographic rates to be correlated in time [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might hold particularly for oystercatchers, which seem to have a low environmental variance of population growth compared with other avian species [57]. More generally, the relative importance of environmental and demographic stochasticity on dynamics is expected to vary between species as a function of general life-history properties [57]. Demographic noise is not necessarily completely white, as individual heterogeneity can cause demographic rates to be correlated in time [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low population size, demographic noise owing to chance effects becomes increasingly important and can even outweigh the effects of environmental noise on population fluctuations [12]. This might hold particularly for oystercatchers, which seem to have a low environmental variance of population growth compared with other avian species [57]. More generally, the relative importance of environmental and demographic stochasticity on dynamics is expected to vary between species as a function of general life-history properties [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Populations undergoing recovery often display wide fluctuations in abundance and population growth rates. These fluctuations could be the result of demographic stochasticity, particularly early on in the recovery process, inter-and intra-specific interactions, or environmental variation (Saether et al 2004, Shelton & Mangel 2011. Regardless of the cause, interannual variability in abundance makes it difficult to determine population trends to quantify the rate of recovery and to make predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In birds-arguably the taxonomic group with the most information on the topic-the amount of demographic stochasticity resulting from individual differences in reproductive success appears to depend on a species' position in the slow-fast continuum of life-histories (Saether et al 2004): Species on the slow end of the spectrum have large generation times and small clutch sizes, and they exhibit relatively little demographic variability. Species on the fast end of the spectrum have short generation times and large clutch sizes, and they exhibit larger variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, if whole clutches can be destroyed by a predator or encounter unfavorable environmental conditions, survival is positively correlated within families and variation increases with increasing average clutch size and decreasing survival probability (see File S3). Some marine organisms like oysters and cod, for example, have extremely high variance in reproductive success, apparently because parents that by chance match their reproductive activity with favorable oceanic conditions leave a large number of surviving offspring, whereas others might not leave any (Hedgecock 1994;Hedgecock and Pudovkin 2011).In birds-arguably the taxonomic group with the most information on the topic-the amount of demographic stochasticity resulting from individual differences in reproductive success appears to depend on a species' position in the slow-fast continuum of life-histories (Saether et al 2004): Species on the slow end of the spectrum have large generation times and small clutch sizes, and they exhibit relatively little demographic variability. Species on the fast end of the spectrum have short generation times and large clutch sizes, and they exhibit larger variability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%