2011
DOI: 10.1656/058.010.0411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life History and Ecology of Coyotes in the Mid-Atlantic States: A Summary of the Scientific Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the northern and southern expansion fronts are distinct ecoregions (Omernik & Griffith, 2014), environmental similarities between the regions do exist, most notably in the high abundance of deer. However, diet studies reveal that deer consumption varies widely among eastern coyote populations (Kilgo, Ray, Ruth, & Miller, 2010;Mastro, 2011;Robinson, Diefenbach, Fuller, Hurst, & Rosenberry, 2014) and that deer consumption is also reasonably common throughout the historical range (Ballard, Lutz, Keegan, Carpenter, & deVos Jr, 2001;Carrera et al, 2008;Gese & Grothe, 1995). As such, selection associated with the range expansion process is perhaps more likely than adaptation to deer rich environments, though the possibility remains that outlier SNP frequencies are driven by selection associated with unmeasured environmental variables rather than by range expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the northern and southern expansion fronts are distinct ecoregions (Omernik & Griffith, 2014), environmental similarities between the regions do exist, most notably in the high abundance of deer. However, diet studies reveal that deer consumption varies widely among eastern coyote populations (Kilgo, Ray, Ruth, & Miller, 2010;Mastro, 2011;Robinson, Diefenbach, Fuller, Hurst, & Rosenberry, 2014) and that deer consumption is also reasonably common throughout the historical range (Ballard, Lutz, Keegan, Carpenter, & deVos Jr, 2001;Carrera et al, 2008;Gese & Grothe, 1995). As such, selection associated with the range expansion process is perhaps more likely than adaptation to deer rich environments, though the possibility remains that outlier SNP frequencies are driven by selection associated with unmeasured environmental variables rather than by range expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if the expansion front is subject to even a modest rate of gene flow from the source population as a result of long distance dispersal, genetic diversity at the periphery could be maintained (e.g., Alleaume-Benharira et al 2006;Berthouly-Salazar et al 2013). Coyotes are known to be highly mobile, with male and female coyotes observed to disperse up to 102.5 km from their natal range, likely playing an important role in the maintenance of genetic diversity (Harrison 1992;Mastro 2011;Hinton et al 2012Hinton et al , 2015.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The West Virginia Division of Natural Resources reported an increase in the number of Coyote pelts sold from 1989 to 2017, but no other demographic information on Coyote populations in the state is currently available (R. Rogers, West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Romney, WV, 2017 per comm.). Information on eastern Coyote home ranges and habitat use in the central Appalachians is also limited (Crimmins et al 2012, Mastro 2011, Morin and Kelly 2017. We used telemetry data from 8 radio-collared Coyotes monitored across 16 counties to obtain preliminary baseline information on Coyote home-range size and third-order habitat selection in West Virginia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%