2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle energy and greenhouse emissions analysis of wind turbines and the effect of size on energy yield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
119
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
119
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations were made by one study [15] that noted an improvement in the environmental performance of wind electricity generation systems with increasing installed electricity generation capacity, the reason being attributed to the effect of scaling (decreased material consumption per kWh of electricity produced). The use of large scale wind turbines also benefits by reducing the required footprint area per unit of rated output [26]. The mean life cycle GHG emissions were noted to be higher in the case of onshore wind electricity generation systems than the offshore wind electricity generation systems (refer to Fig.…”
Section: Statistical Evaluation Of Wind Lca Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar observations were made by one study [15] that noted an improvement in the environmental performance of wind electricity generation systems with increasing installed electricity generation capacity, the reason being attributed to the effect of scaling (decreased material consumption per kWh of electricity produced). The use of large scale wind turbines also benefits by reducing the required footprint area per unit of rated output [26]. The mean life cycle GHG emissions were noted to be higher in the case of onshore wind electricity generation systems than the offshore wind electricity generation systems (refer to Fig.…”
Section: Statistical Evaluation Of Wind Lca Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coastal wind electricity generation systems produced less GHGs than the inland wind electricity generation systems [25]. There is no significant difference in the energy yield between the use of small and large scale wind turbines [26]. There are several other studies [19,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33] that quantified the GHGs by performing the LCA of real-world wind electricity generation systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LCA studies either neglect replacement of parts (e.g., [37,40]) or variably assume that certain shares of components must be replaced (e.g., [27] assumes 50% gearbox replacement during lifetime, [36] one blade and 15% generator replacement, and [35] 5% complete wind turbine replacement). One study develops a high-maintenance scenario in which 1 generator, 1 gearbox and 1 set of blades requires replacement [32].…”
Section: Transportation On-site Construction and Operation And Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of bio-fuels it varies between 25g/kWh and 93 g/kWh, depending on the type of bio-mass used (Parliamentary office post note, 2006). Wind energy shows the least value of 6 g/kWh (Crawford, 2009). Based from the above data, GHG saving percent of different types of OE device, as determined from equation 3 are shown in Table 8 and Fig.…”
Section: Comparative Study On Co 2 Saving Percentagementioning
confidence: 96%