2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle assessment study on nuclear based sustainable hydrogen production options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It concluded that hydrogen was the most environmentally efficient fuel with global warming potential as 0.04 kg CO 2 eq/kWh Siddiqui and Dincer, 2019 The water electrolysis route, coal gasification and biomass gasification routes showed global warming potential of 28.6, 23.7 and 4.4 kgCO 2 eq/kg H 2 , respectively. In addition to this, the ethanol, methanol and methanebased hydrogen production routes are estimated to have 12.2, 17.9 and 13.8 kgCO 2 eq/kg H 2 of global warming potential, respectively Valente et al, 2019 In terms of global warming potential, biomass hydrogen was a better option than conventional hydrogen, however, to a lesser extent for acidification potential Karaca et al, 2020 Nuclear-based hydrogen production methods caused global warming potential from 0.48 to 0.71 kgCO 2 eq/kg H 2 high specific energy and non-CO 2 emission after combustion. The challenge is to find hydrogen storage materials with high capacity.…”
Section: Hydrogen Underground Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It concluded that hydrogen was the most environmentally efficient fuel with global warming potential as 0.04 kg CO 2 eq/kWh Siddiqui and Dincer, 2019 The water electrolysis route, coal gasification and biomass gasification routes showed global warming potential of 28.6, 23.7 and 4.4 kgCO 2 eq/kg H 2 , respectively. In addition to this, the ethanol, methanol and methanebased hydrogen production routes are estimated to have 12.2, 17.9 and 13.8 kgCO 2 eq/kg H 2 of global warming potential, respectively Valente et al, 2019 In terms of global warming potential, biomass hydrogen was a better option than conventional hydrogen, however, to a lesser extent for acidification potential Karaca et al, 2020 Nuclear-based hydrogen production methods caused global warming potential from 0.48 to 0.71 kgCO 2 eq/kg H 2 high specific energy and non-CO 2 emission after combustion. The challenge is to find hydrogen storage materials with high capacity.…”
Section: Hydrogen Underground Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photoelectrochemical/ PEC 44,97 The electrodes are in contact with an electrolyte in a single device where, at least, one is photoactive. 326,339,342,351,352,370 3.5 339,342,351,352,359,370 10 371 4.5 330,342,372,373 82.0 330,374,375 AEC-grid 24.6 341,376-379 1.9 330,353,376 3.1 380 7.2 327,342,346,352,357,372 74.2 341,352 PV-EC 3.4 14,337,342,351,352,381 9.0 14,337,342,351,352 10.0 382 7.5 279,330,337,373 12.3 277,383 Wind-EC 0.9 14,337,339,...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference from conventional electrolysis to nuclear high temperature electrolysis (HTE), is that the later uses heat from nuclear power plants to moderate electricity consumed for electrolysis. In general, nuclear HTE occurs at 800-1000 o C and an yttria-stabilised zirconia is used as an electrolyte [41]. A solar-based electrolysis consists of a concentrating collector, a heat engine, an electrical generator, and electrolyser.…”
Section: Hydrogen Production Routesmentioning
confidence: 99%