Life Cycle Assessment on the Use of Ultra High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concretes with Enhanced Durability for Structures in Extremely Aggressive Environments: Case Study Analyses
“…As mentioned above, service life and durability are crucial in LCA studies, but, unlike ordinary concrete, there is little literature on this subject. Caruso et al [374] and di Summa et al [375] investigated the effect of the extended durability with a resulting service life of at least 30% longer on LCA output, developing a cradle-to-grave analysis for innovative cementitious materials exposed to aggressive ambient conditions. Here the authors investigated, in the construction of a basin for geothermal water settling, a high-performance fibre-reinforced cementitious composite with high content of slag (50% replacement by volume of cement) and 1.5% by volume of steel fibres (to obtain a strain hardening tensile behaviour) and autogenous healing stimulated by crystalline admixtures (CA).…”
Section: A Pathway For the Incorporation Of Self-healing Performance ...mentioning
Self-healing is recognized as a promising technique for increasing the durability of concrete structures by healing cracks, thereby reducing the need for maintenance activities over the service life and decreasing the environmental impact. Various self-healing technologies have been applied to a wide range of cementitious materials, and the performance has generally been assessed under 'ideal' laboratory conditions. Performance tests under ideal conditions, tailored to the self-healing mechanism, can demonstrate the self-healing potential. However, there is an urgent need to prove the robustness and reliability of self-healing under realistic simulated conditions and in real applications before entering the market. This review focuses on the influence of cracks on degradation phenomena in reinforced concrete structures, the efficiency of different healing agents in various realistic (aggressive) scenarios, test methods for evaluating self-healing efficiency, and provides a pathway for integrating self-healing performance into a life-cycle encompassing durability-based design.
“…As mentioned above, service life and durability are crucial in LCA studies, but, unlike ordinary concrete, there is little literature on this subject. Caruso et al [374] and di Summa et al [375] investigated the effect of the extended durability with a resulting service life of at least 30% longer on LCA output, developing a cradle-to-grave analysis for innovative cementitious materials exposed to aggressive ambient conditions. Here the authors investigated, in the construction of a basin for geothermal water settling, a high-performance fibre-reinforced cementitious composite with high content of slag (50% replacement by volume of cement) and 1.5% by volume of steel fibres (to obtain a strain hardening tensile behaviour) and autogenous healing stimulated by crystalline admixtures (CA).…”
Section: A Pathway For the Incorporation Of Self-healing Performance ...mentioning
Self-healing is recognized as a promising technique for increasing the durability of concrete structures by healing cracks, thereby reducing the need for maintenance activities over the service life and decreasing the environmental impact. Various self-healing technologies have been applied to a wide range of cementitious materials, and the performance has generally been assessed under 'ideal' laboratory conditions. Performance tests under ideal conditions, tailored to the self-healing mechanism, can demonstrate the self-healing potential. However, there is an urgent need to prove the robustness and reliability of self-healing under realistic simulated conditions and in real applications before entering the market. This review focuses on the influence of cracks on degradation phenomena in reinforced concrete structures, the efficiency of different healing agents in various realistic (aggressive) scenarios, test methods for evaluating self-healing efficiency, and provides a pathway for integrating self-healing performance into a life-cycle encompassing durability-based design.
“…where r is the annual real discount rate and T is the number of future years. The annual real discount rate, which has to be determined through a sensitivity analysis on at least two different rates, one of which shall be 3% expressed in real terms according to the EN 16627:2015 (UNI, 2015) and to the Commission Delegated Regulation n°244/2012 of 16 January 2012 (Commission Delegated Regulation, 2012), is then assumed equal to 3% according to (Caruso et. Al, 2020).…”
“…Costs of the activities to be developed in the future have been estimated by means of an interest rate calculated as in similar studies. 8,70 Table 12 gives a brief overview of the concrete and steel quantities accounted for the scope of this research while Table 13 lists the main construction rates employed for the cost estimation.…”
Section: Lca and Lcc-system Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LCC has been performed employing the prices reported in the Italian construction costs list 68,69 or, alternatively, carrying out a market survey to collect the missing ones. Costs of the activities to be developed in the future have been estimated by means of an interest rate calculated as in similar studies 8,70 . Table 12 gives a brief overview of the concrete and steel quantities accounted for the scope of this research while Table 13 lists the main construction rates employed for the cost estimation.…”
Section: The Influence Of Dad On Lca and Lcc Outcomesmentioning
The development of innovative cementitious materials such as Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC) requires tailored approaches to assess both the environmental and economic impact of structural applications employing them. For this purpose, in this paper, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) methodologies are integrated into a Durability Assessment‐Based Design (DAD) workflow which combines structural design algorithms for UHPC with the assessment of the durability performance, with the aim of predicting the evolution of the structural performance all along the service life (SL) in the intended scenarios. As a case study a water tank made of UHPC has been herein selected and compared to a reference made of ordinary reinforced concrete (ORC). While the ORC solution was designed with cantilever cast in situ walls, two different design concepts were assessed for the UHPC basin: one with cast in situ walls and one with precast slabs supported by ORC columns. Moreover, two different mix designs (mainly differing on the alternative presence of silica fume or slag) have been investigated for the UHPC basin and a SL equal to 50 years has been taken into account for each structure. The optimized design, together with the reduced frequency of the maintenance activities for the UHPC structure, allowed by the UHPC superior material and structural durability, resulted into consistent reductions of environmental impacts, up to 76% as for Human Toxicity and Fresh Water Aquatic Ecotoxicity in comparison to the ORC solution. In addition to this, an assessment of the overall construction and maintenance costs that occur during the lifetime of the structures showed a cost reduction higher than 40% for both UHPC solutions, mainly due to a reduction of up to 6% during the construction phase and 91% for the maintenance activities. This also highlights the importance of the correct metrics in evaluating the sustainability of UHPC structural applications, which has to move forward from the units volume or mass of material and its individual constituents to functional units, representative of the benefits of using advanced cement based materials in structurally and environmentally challenging service scenarios.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.