6 This study assesses the environmental impact of four alternatives for reinforcing 100 m 2 of 7 concrete footpath (Functional Unit, FU) by using cradle to gate life cycle assessment (LCA), 8 based on the Australian context. Specifically, the four options considered are a) producing 9 steel reinforcing mesh (SRM), b) producing virgin polypropylene (PP) fibre, c) recycling 10 industrial PP waste and d) recycling domestic PP waste. The FU yields 364 kg of SRM (in a) 11 and 40 kg of PP fibres (in b, c and d), necessary to achieve the same degree of reinforcing in 12 concrete. All the activities required to produce these materials are considered in the study, 13 namely manufacturing and transportation, and also recycling and reprocessing in the case of 14 industrial and domestic recycled PP waste fibres. These processes are individually analysed 15 and quantified in terms of material consumption, water use, and emissions into the 16 environment. This allows for the impacts from producing recycled fibres to be compared 17 with those from producing virgin PP fibre and SRM, which are traditionally used. The LCA 18 results show that industrial recycled PP fibre offers important environmental benefits over 19 virgin PP fibre. Specifically, the industrial recycled PP fibre can save 50 % of CO 2 equivalent, 20 65 % of PO 4 equivalent, 29 % of water and 78 % of oil equivalent, compared to the virgin PP 21 fibre. When compared to the SRM, the industrial recycled PP fibre can save 93 % of CO 2 22 equivalent, 97 % of PO 4 equivalent, 99 % of water and 91 % of oil equivalent. The domestic 23 M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT2 recycled PP fibre also generates reduced environmental impacts compared to virgin PP fibre, 24 except for higher consumption of water associated with the washing processes. 25