2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1587-9_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle assessment of processed food

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These contrast with diet choice, animal health, worker lifestyle, and social and economic conditions, which are considered as non-environmental issues. Food processing has fewer environmental impacts than farming [73] , because processors are regulated by law or respond to their own interest based on reports and surveys from the food chain to reduce inputs, energy, and water that has cost savings advantages and consequent environmental benefits [57] .…”
Section: Food Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These contrast with diet choice, animal health, worker lifestyle, and social and economic conditions, which are considered as non-environmental issues. Food processing has fewer environmental impacts than farming [73] , because processors are regulated by law or respond to their own interest based on reports and surveys from the food chain to reduce inputs, energy, and water that has cost savings advantages and consequent environmental benefits [57] .…”
Section: Food Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing the whole product life cycle (from cradle-tograve, or cradle-to-consumer) allows the magnitude of the environmental impact to be quantified, as does the contribution of the processing stage to the total impact. Nevertheless, an analysis restricted to processing (from farm gate-to-factory gate) may be an interesting approach if the LCA is intended for technological comparisons, provided that the technologies to be compared ensure the same ratio of agricultural raw material input to food product output (Arcand et al, 2012). Along these lines, Hospido et al (2010) suggest, for comparative studies, including only the parts of the system that are affected (and, therefore, show differences) by the change.…”
Section: System Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-environmental issues include diet simplification, animal welfare, workers' conditions, and the generation of acceptable social and economic conditions. The relative importance of these factors depends strongly on the food sector and the stakeholder within the food chain but, in general, food processing has lower environmental impacts than farming [3]. Either because they are forced to by legislations or as a direct result of their own initiatives, an increasing number of food processors are evaluating their business activities in order to report, improve, and/or market their environmental efforts including their supply chain.…”
Section: Lca Of Food Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cradle-to-grave (top), cradle-to-gate (bottom left), and gate-to-gate (bottom right) system boundaries. Source: [3] Food Eng Rev (2013) 5:1-17 7 purchasers and consumers. On the other hand, performing an LCA reveals potential areas to reduce inputs, energy, and water which has cost savings advantages and consequent environmental benefits.…”
Section: Lca Of Food Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%